Wastewater treatment depends on microbial populations that clean up pollutants. To understand or optimize these systems, scientists run batch activity tests — small experiments to see:
➡️ These tests help determine stoichiometry (mass balances) and kinetic rates for modeling microbial activity.
Batch tests vary depending on the microbe and process studied:
The book starts with EBPR since it combines anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic stages — the most complex case!
EBPR removes phosphorus biologically rather than chemically, saving costs and energy ⚡. It relies on Polyphosphate-Accumulating Organisms (PAO).
Main polymers used:
Example polymers: PHB, PHV, PH2MV — types of PHA depending on acetate or propionate used.
➡️ This is how EBPR actually removes phosphorus from wastewater.
GAO (Glycogen-Accumulating Organisms) behave like PAO but don’t use poly-P and don’t remove phosphorus. They rely only on glycogen. If GAO dominate, EBPR fails ❌
GAO thrive under:
To test EBPR performance, scientists use reactors (fermenters) under controlled conditions.
A good setup must:
📸 The chapter shows vintage EBPR reactors from Delft University — early 1990s pioneering setups for Bio-P modeling!
These models help design modern EBPR plants that work efficiently even under complex conditions.
The reference list spans decades of foundational EBPR work — from Mino, Comeau, van Loosdrecht, Nielsen, and Oehmen, all the way to modern metabolic and molecular studies identifying Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis 🧫.
This body of work built today’s understanding of how activated sludge communities achieve biological phosphorus removal.
| Stage | Key Event | Energy Source | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anaerobic | VFA uptake, PHA storage, poly-P hydrolysis | Poly-P + Glycogen | P released |
| Aerobic | PHA oxidation, P uptake, glycogen rebuild | Oxygen | P removed |
| Anoxic | Same as aerobic but with nitrate/nitrite | Nitrate/nitrite | Simultaneous P+N removal |