Lesson 11 Paul et al. 2021 biopolymers

Environmental Biotechnology

Here’s your fun yet detailed educational summary of Paul et al. (2021) — “Biopolymers Production from Wastes and Wastewaters by Mixed Microbial Cultures (MMC)” 🎓🌍


🌱 1. Why Biopolymers?

Biopolymers are natural macromolecules (proteins, polysaccharides, PHAs, etc.) made by living organisms — they’re biodegradable, biocompatible, and renewable. Unlike fossil-based plastics, they can reduce waste and CO₂ emissions.

But… 💸 they’re still expensive to make! So scientists want to produce them from organic wastes using open mixed microbial cultures (MMC) — microbial “teams” that thrive without sterilization and handle complex substrates.


🧃 2. Feedstocks: From Waste to Resource

To be sustainable, a substrate should be:

  • Available locally ♻️
  • Rich in carbon and low in toxins
  • Cheap and renewable

Examples: food waste, wastewater sludge, paper mill residues. High C:N or C:P ratios trigger microbes to store carbon as polymers when nutrients are limited.

This fits perfectly into the circular economy, turning “trash into treasure.”


🦠 3. Open Mixed Microbial Cultures (MMC)

MMC = a community of microbes, not a single strain. They offer: ✅ resilience ✅ substrate flexibility ✅ natural contamination resistance …but also ❗challenges in control and reproducibility.

Key idea: “Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects.” → Reactor conditions (O₂, nutrients, SRT, pH, etc.) decide which microbes dominate.


🧬 4. The Big Three Biopolymers

A. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) 🧫

Microbial polyesters (e.g., PHB, PHBV). Stored as intracellular carbon & energy reserves when nutrients like N or P are limited. ✅ Biodegradable plastics ✅ Tunable properties (short-chain vs medium-chain monomers)

➡️ MMCs can make PHAs cheaply using waste carbon sources (VFAs, glycerol, whey, etc.). Pilot projects like PHA2USE (Netherlands) show industrial feasibility.


B. Polysaccharides & EPS 🍶

Microbes secrete exopolysaccharides (EPS) for protection and adhesion. EPS have gelling, flocculating, and coating abilities — great for paper, bioplastics, and water treatment.

Key idea: – Carbon excess + nutrient limitation → EPS production. – Different substrates → different EPS structures and properties.

Modern interest: extracting EPS from aerobic granular sludge (AGS) — already used industrially as Kaumera Nereda® Gum in the Netherlands 🧪.


C. Microbial Proteins (Single-Cell Proteins, SCP) 🍽️

Dried microbial biomass rich in protein (43–95% DW). Can replace fishmeal and soy in animal feed — especially in aquaculture.

Made from wastes like:

  • biogas digestate
  • pulp mill liquor
  • methane/methanol effluents

Bonus: low land use and minimal environmental footprint.


🧭 5. Strategies for Microbial Selection

Microbial “consortia engineering” = tuning conditions to favor desired microbes.

🧩 Key Parameters

  • Reactor type: Batch, SBR, Continuous
  • SRT (Sludge Retention Time) controls which microbes stay
  • Substrate composition
  • Environmental pressure (e.g. pH, salinity, O₂, nutrients)

⚔️ Microbial Competition

r-strategists (fast growers) vs K-strategists (efficient scavengers). Other interactions include mutualism, predation, and quorum sensing 🧠 — microbes “chat” via chemical signals to coordinate EPS or PHA synthesis!


⚙️ 6. Specific Selection Strategies

A. Aerobic Dynamic Feeding (ADF) = Feast/Famine regime 🍽️😶

Short feast (plenty of carbon) → long famine (none). Selects microbes that store carbon internally as PHAs for survival.

Optimal conditions:

  • SRT ≈ 1 day
  • Low feast/famine ratio (<10%)
  • 25–30 °C → Up to 90% PHAs in biomass dry weight!

Used for wastes like whey, molasses, pulp mill effluent, and food waste.


B. Anoxic/Anaerobic Feast–Famine 🌀

Alternating oxygen levels selects PAOs and GAOs — bacteria that store PHAs or glycogen while removing N & P. Example: pilot WWTPs achieving 49% PHAs content + nutrient removal.


C. Chemostat Mode ⚗️

Continuous reactor under dual limitation (C + P) selects PHA-accumulators with high phosphorus affinity (e.g. Malikia sp., Acinetobacter sp.). → Up to 80% PHB in cells. P-limitation is a powerful selective pressure!


D. Direct from Waste Activated Sludge (WAS)

Municipal sludge already contains PHA-storing microbes. Under N or P limitation, direct feeding with VFAs can yield ≈ 70% PHB in biomass.


E. Extremophiles 💥

Halophilic archaea like Haloferax mediterranei thrive in salty media, reducing contamination risk and water use. Produce both PHAs and anionic polysaccharides.


💧 7. EPS from Aerobic Granular Sludge (AGS)

Granules = tiny, self-organized bio-balls 🟢 that trap bacteria and EPS. They:

  • settle fast (good for wastewater treatment)
  • produce hydrogels (alginate-like or “granulan”)
  • are now industrially harvested as Kaumera Nereda® Gum

Optimized by alternating anaerobic/aerobic phases, short settling times, and high shear forces. → Slow-growing PAOs & GAOs dominate → stable granules + valuable EPS.


🧫 8. Microbial Protein Production

Classic routes:

  • Methane/methanol oxidizers (no sterilization needed)
  • Hydrogen oxidizers (use H₂ from electrolysis + N from wastewater)
  • Purple phototrophic bacteria (PPB) using IR light 🌈 to turn organics into protein while cleaning water

→ High protein (up to 70% DW), low cost, sustainable fish-feed alternative.


🚀 9. Outlook

MMC systems = nature-inspired factories for circular biotechnologies 🌍 Advantages:

  • Use complex, cheap feedstocks
  • No sterilization needed
  • Co-produce valuable materials (PHA, EPS, SCP)

Challenges ahead:

  • Controlling community composition
  • Ensuring product purity & consistency
  • Scaling and optimizing reactors
  • Guaranteeing biosafety for food/feed uses

In short: 🌿 Waste → Microbes → Biopolymers → Sustainable Future. MMC systems could turn our wastewater plants into true bio-refineries of the circular economy! 🔁💧🧫


Would you like me to make a diagram-style cheat sheet (A4 layout) summarizing these points visually — with icons for each biopolymer type and process flow?

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)