Lesson 4 Slide

Applied Molecular Cellular Biology

🧬 Genetics of Endometriosis — Grant Montgomery

Goal: Understand how genetics influence a complex, painful disease affecting millions of women.


🌺 What is Endometriosis?

  • Definition: Growths that look like uterine lining (endometrium) appearing outside the uterus — on the peritoneum, ovaries, or bowel.
  • Cell mix: Lesions contain diverse cells, forming a unique microenvironment.
  • Common triggers: Early puberty, heavy bleeding.
  • Symptoms: Vary a lot — pain, GI disorders, headaches, depression, fatigue.
  • Problem: Overlapping conditions confuse diagnosis → delays of 6–10 years on average!

📊 Endometriosis in Numbers

  • Affects ~1 in 9 women in Australia.
  • Major cause of pain + infertility.
  • Economic impact: ~$7–9 billion/year (≈ DKK 28–36 billion).
  • No known cause or cure (more common than breast cancer).
  • Genetic link: First-degree relatives → 2–3× higher risk.
  • Genetic contribution:50% of total risk.

🧠 Understanding Genetic Risk

🔹 Monogenic diseases

  • Simple inheritance, single gene defects: Cystic fibrosis, Sickle cell, Huntington’s, Hemophilia, Duchenne MD.

🔹 Complex diseases (like endometriosis)

  • Many genes each with small effects.
  • Heritability: 30–70%.
  • Require Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) instead of single-gene mapping.

🧬 Twin Study (Treloar et al., 1999)

  • First to estimate heritability: ~51% genetic risk.
  • Foundation for mapping genes linked to endometriosis.
  • Early “candidate gene” studies failed → need bigger, unbiased genome scans.

🌐 GWAS Revolution

Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) showed how to map genetic risk in common diseases using thousands of cases.


🧩 Discovery of Genetic Risk Factors

Rahmioglu et al., 2023 (Nature Genetics):

  • 42 genomic regions linked to endometriosis.
  • 49 independent signals, 31 new discoveries.
  • Replication in multiple studies = strong confidence.
  • Purpose: Understand disease biology, not just find markers.

Next steps:

  1. Fine mapping → pinpoint causal variants.
  2. Functional studies → identify target genes & pathways.

🧭 How Do Genetic Variants Increase Risk?

Mortlock et al., 2020

  • Most risk SNPs = non-coding regions → regulate genes indirectly.
  • Some in coding regions alter proteins directly.
  • Regulation can happen in the endometrium or other tissues (like blood).

🧬 Epigenetics & Gene Regulation

NIH Roadmap & ENCODE projects: Mapped 111+ epigenomes → help locate where regulatory SNPs act. Epigenetic data = vital to interpret non-coding variants.


📈 Gene Expression and Menstrual Cycle

Key insight: ~46% of genes change expression through the menstrual cycle! → So, researchers must control for cycle stage when comparing patients.

After correcting for stage + multiple testing: → No significant gene expression differences between cases and controls.

This means genetic regulation, not expression level alone, likely drives risk.


🧪 Linking GWAS and Expression (eQTL)

Zhu et al., 2016; Umans et al., 2021 Integrating GWAS with expression QTL (eQTL) data can pinpoint causal genes. Used Summary data–based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) to test causality.


🧩 Case Study 1 — SRP14-AS1 (Chromosome 15)

Rahmioglu et al., 2023

  • SNPs here affect SRP14 expression in endometrium & blood.
  • Also modify DNA methylation and chromatin interactions → possibly affect BMF, which influences sex hormone binding and hormone bioavailability. 🧠 Takeaway: Hormone regulation = key mechanism.

🧩 Case Study 2 — FGD6/VEZT (Chromosome 12)

Mortlock et al., 2021

  • Another strong risk locus linked to cell adhesion and epithelial structure.
  • Functional experiments support its causal role.

🐢 Why Progress Is Slow

Most GWAS “hits” don’t match known eQTLs:

  • Non-coding SNPs = under strong evolutionary constraint, often in enhancers far from target genes.
  • eQTL SNPs = usually near genes, less constrained. ➡️ Mismatch explains why linking SNPs to genes is hard.

🔍 Key Causal Candidates (Rahmioglu et al., 2023)

42 loci, 49 signals. High-confidence variants include:

  • SYNE1, ESR1, LNC-LBCS, HOXA10, HOXC10, LINC00629
  • Regulation of SRP14, HOXB9, TRA2A in endometrium.
  • Stronger effects seen in severe disease cases.
  • Shared genetics with pain, GI disorders, migraine, depression, ovarian cancer.

🧩 Clinical impact: Understanding these overlaps can improve diagnosis and treatment.


🔄 Pathways Emerging

Common pathways involve:

  • Reproductive system development
  • Cell proliferation
  • Epithelial differentiation 🕸️ Key genes interact in overlapping networks → amplify small effects into big outcomes.

👩‍🔬 The GRD Lab Team (UQ + Aalborg)

  • Prof. Grant Montgomery (leader)
  • Drs. Brett McKinnon, Sally Mortlock, Sugarniya Subramaniam
  • PhD students: Sushma Marla, Fei Yang, Isabelle McGrath, Li Ying Thong, Isaac Barffour, Sharat Alturi
  • Expertise across genetics, cell biology, data science, and clinical collaboration.

❤️ Summary Takeaways

TopicKey Point
DiseaseChronic, painful, complex, underdiagnosed
Risk~50% genetic
GWAS42 loci discovered, many non-coding
MechanismMostly regulatory (non-coding → gene expression, hormones)
ProgressSlow due to non-overlap between GWAS and eQTL
OverlapShares genetics with pain, mood, and inflammatory disorders
GoalIdentify causal genes and pathways → better treatment and understanding

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)