Goal: Understand how genetics influence a complex, painful disease affecting millions of women.
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) showed how to map genetic risk in common diseases using thousands of cases.
Rahmioglu et al., 2023 (Nature Genetics):
Next steps:
Mortlock et al., 2020
NIH Roadmap & ENCODE projects: Mapped 111+ epigenomes → help locate where regulatory SNPs act. Epigenetic data = vital to interpret non-coding variants.
Key insight: ~46% of genes change expression through the menstrual cycle! → So, researchers must control for cycle stage when comparing patients.
After correcting for stage + multiple testing: → No significant gene expression differences between cases and controls.
This means genetic regulation, not expression level alone, likely drives risk.
Zhu et al., 2016; Umans et al., 2021 Integrating GWAS with expression QTL (eQTL) data can pinpoint causal genes. Used Summary data–based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) to test causality.
Rahmioglu et al., 2023
Mortlock et al., 2021
Most GWAS “hits” don’t match known eQTLs:
42 loci, 49 signals. High-confidence variants include:
🧩 Clinical impact: Understanding these overlaps can improve diagnosis and treatment.
Common pathways involve:
| Topic | Key Point |
|---|---|
| Disease | Chronic, painful, complex, underdiagnosed |
| Risk | ~50% genetic |
| GWAS | 42 loci discovered, many non-coding |
| Mechanism | Mostly regulatory (non-coding → gene expression, hormones) |
| Progress | Slow due to non-overlap between GWAS and eQTL |
| Overlap | Shares genetics with pain, mood, and inflammatory disorders |
| Goal | Identify causal genes and pathways → better treatment and understanding |