Exam 2025 Practice

Applied Molecular Cellular Biology

πŸ“˜ Applied Exam Practice β€” Complete Theoretical Summary (Exam-Focused)

This document is essentially an exam walkthrough + meta-guidance explaining:

  • what kinds of questions appear,
  • what theoretical understanding is expected,
  • and why certain answers earn points.

The exam tests conceptual understanding, data interpretation, and methodological reasoning, not memorization of wording.


🧠 1. Paper Overview Questions (Big-Picture Understanding)

✍️ β€œDescribe what this paper is about (in your own words)”

What examiners want:

  • A clear summary, not copied text
  • Correct biological context
  • Awareness of the broader goal

Core theory:

  • The paper focuses on recombinant insulin production in yeast
  • Yeast is used as an expression system
  • The ultimate goal is cheap, scalable insulin production

πŸ”‘ Key insight: Saying only β€œthey made insulin in yeast” is incomplete. You must connect expression system β†’ application (biomanufacturing, medicine, food biotech).


🧫 2. Why Use Yeast Instead of E. coli?

βš–οΈ Expression System Comparison

FeatureYeast 🧬E. coli 🦠
Cell typeEukaryoteProkaryote
Protein foldingβœ… Better❌ Often misfolded
Disulfide bondsβœ… Yes❌ Limited
Secretionβœ… Possible❌ Difficult
PTMsPartialNone

Theory tested:

  • Protein folding matters for functional insulin
  • Yeast has eukaryotic chaperones
  • Yeast can secrete proteins, simplifying purification

🧠 Exam logic: Yeast bridges the gap between bacterial simplicity and mammalian complexity.


🧬 3. Why Produce Insulin from Multiple Species? πŸ„πŸ”πŸ–

Core theoretical motivation:

  • Insulin is a growth factor
  • Different species’ cells respond best to species-matched growth factors
  • Applications include:
    • Cultured meat
    • Serum-free media

πŸ§ͺ Ethical & practical angle

  • Replaces fetal calf serum (FCS):
    • Expensive
    • Ethically problematic
    • Batch-variable

πŸ”‘ Exam takeaway: This is not just molecular biology β€” it’s biotechnology + ethics + scalability.


🧬 4. Plasmid Map Interpretation (Classic Exam Question)

You must identify functional elements, not just name them.

Typical components:

  • Promoter (e.g. galactose promoter)
  • Gene of interest (insulin)
  • Signal peptide (for secretion)
  • Selection markers (yeast & bacterial)
  • Origin of replication (yeast vs E. coli)
  • Terminator

⚠️ Galactose promoter nuance

  • Expression occurs without galactose
  • Reason: leaky expression / engineered regulation
  • You are not expected to explain regulation failure unless relevant

πŸ“Œ Exam scoring:

  • Listing components = OK
  • Explaining function = better
  • Understanding why present = best

🧩 5. Why Replace the C-Peptide with HL18?

Insulin biology refresher:

  • Native insulin contains a C-peptide
  • C-peptide is cleaved during maturation

HL18 advantages:

  • Improves expression
  • Enhances secretion
  • Simplifies processing

🧠 Key principle: Protein engineering is used to optimize production, not just mimic biology.


πŸ§ͺ 6. DTT + Ξ²-Mercaptoethanol in SDS-PAGE

πŸ”¬ What does this show?

  • Insulin chains are linked by disulfide bonds
  • Reducing agents break these bonds
  • Result:
    • Non-reduced β†’ one band
    • Reduced β†’ multiple chains

🧠 Exam logic: You must connect chemical treatment β†’ molecular structure β†’ gel pattern.


🧲 7. IMAC (Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography)

Principle:

  • His-tagged proteins bind metal ions (Ni²⁺, Co²⁺)
  • Elution via imidazole competition

πŸ“Œ Why this matters on the exam:

  • Even if not taught in class, you must:
    • Recognize the method
    • Understand why it works

🧠 Meta-lesson: You are expected to prepare unfamiliar methods in advance.


πŸ“Š 8. Figure Interpretation & Poor Figure Legends

SDS-PAGE figure criticism:

  • Missing:
    • Clear lane labels
    • Ladder identity
    • Experimental conditions

πŸ“Œ What examiners reward:

  • Noticing missing controls
  • Suggesting improvements
  • Demonstrating scientific literacy

πŸ“ˆ 9. MTT Assay: Why Only a Small Effect?

Possible explanations:

  • Medium already contains growth factors
  • Insulin receptors may be saturated
  • MTT measures metabolism, not proliferation directly

Better experimental design:

  • Serum-free conditions
  • Washout step
  • More sensitive assays

🧠 Key principle: Negative or weak results β‰  failure β€” they require interpretation.


πŸ” 10. Alternative Proliferation Assays

Valid answers include:

  • Cell counting
  • BrdU / EdU incorporation
  • Wound-healing assays
  • Colony formation

πŸ“Œ Exam rule: Any method is valid if the biological reasoning is sound.


🧬 11. Antibody Specificity (aa 30–40)

Western blot logic:

  • Size β‰  identity
  • Antibody binding confirms protein identity

Cross-species recognition:

  • Region 30–40 is conserved
  • Antibody cannot distinguish human vs cow vs pig insulin

🧠 Key takeaway: Epitope conservation determines antibody specificity.


🧠 12. Does Insulin Origin Need to Match Cell Type?

Answer: No strong evidence

  • Data shows similar effects across species
  • No clear species-specific advantage

πŸ“Œ Exam insight: You must challenge assumptions using data, not intuition.


🧬 13. Yeast Genome Integration & Marker Recycling

Step 1: Homologous recombination

  • Linear DNA integrates efficiently in yeast

Step 2: Marker removal

  • Avoids metabolic burden
  • Selection via 5-FOA / URA3 counter-selection

🧠 Exam challenge: This tests genetic engineering logic, not memorization.


🧬 14. DNA Sequencing & BLAST Interpretation

Core rules:

  • DNA is read 5β€² β†’ 3β€²
  • Databases may store reverse complements

Common mistakes:

  • Ignoring strand orientation
  • Comparing sequences backwards

πŸ“Œ Scoring tip: Evaluate each option β€” partial credit is possible.


🌰 15. Detecting Amygdalin (Bitter Almond Taste)

Valid detection methods:

  • ELISA (if antibodies exist)
  • Mass spectrometry
  • NMR
  • Chemical extraction

πŸ˜‚ Bonus logic:

  • Taste β‰  quantitative but shows chemical awareness

πŸ› 16. DNA Damage Assays in C. elegans

Possible approaches:

  • Reporter strains
  • DNA damage markers
  • Apoptosis assays
  • Long-range PCR

🧠 Key idea: Genotoxicity = phenotype + molecular readout.


🦠 17. Pathogenic Bacteria as Biopesticides

Data interpretation:

  • EM images show epithelial destruction
  • Indicates toxin activity

⚠️ Practical conclusion:

  • Not acceptable for human food
  • Ethical & regulatory implications matter

πŸ” 18. Expansion Microscopy

Principle:

  • Sample embedded in polymer gel
  • Gel expands isotropically (~4–5Γ—)
  • Improves resolution beyond diffraction limit

🍞 Analogy:

  • Raisins in expanding dough

🚰 19. Aquaporins: Structure & Function

Structure:

  • 6 transmembrane helices
  • Tetrameric assembly

Functions:

  • Water transport
  • Cell migration
  • Adhesion
  • Cancer relevance

🧠 Why multiple AQPs?

  • Different tissues
  • Different regulation
  • Different permeability

βš—οΈ 20. Synthetic Aquaporins & Inhibitors

Observations:

  • Synthetic AQPs increase migration
  • Hg²⁺ inhibits both natural & synthetic AQPs
  • DA-18 selectively inhibits synthetic AQPs

Mechanistic reasoning:

  • Charge complementarity
  • Channel blockage

🧬 21. Therapeutic Strategies for Aquaporin Disorders

Acceptable answers:

  • Small-molecule modulators
  • RNA-based approaches
  • CRISPR-Cas9
  • Trafficking correction

πŸ“Œ Exam rule: Creativity is allowed if biologically plausible.


🧠 22. Organoids & Conserved Gene Function

Strategy:

  • Edit human stem cells (CRISPR)
  • Generate brain organoids
  • Assess dopaminergic neurons
  • Rescue with orthologs

🧠 Key concept: Model systems test functional conservation, not just sequence similarity.


πŸ“ Final Exam Strategy (Explicitly Stated in File)

βœ… Answer all questions βœ… Start simple, then add detail ❌ Don’t get stuck on one hard question ❌ Don’t skip supplementary material

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)