Day 9 part 2

Applied Molecular Cellular Biology

🌟 Master-Level Summary: Antibody Discovery Using Phage Display + Cell Biology Surprises

(Theoretical Concepts Only — Fully Detailed)


🧬 1. Core Concept: What Phage Display Actually Selects For

Phage display is a selection system where billions of phages, each displaying a different antibody variant, are exposed to a target (protein or cell). Only the phages whose antibodies bind survive the selection.

⭐ What selection really enriches for:

  1. High-affinity binders 🔒 Each round enriches the strongest binders, because they stay attached during washing.
  2. Highly expressed antigens 📈 If an antigen is abundant on the cell surface, more phages collide with it → more chance of retention.

⚠️ Consequence

Low-abundance, biologically valuable markers (like cancer-specific receptors) may be lost during repeated rounds because they’re rare and weakly represented.

👉 Key takeaway

When the goal is biomarker discovery, one-round selection is theoretically superior — if you can control background noise.


🧫 2. Theoretical Issue: Background Binders (“Sticky Phages”)

Some phages bind not because their antibody recognizes a target, but because:

  • The phage particle itself is sticky
  • It adheres non-specifically to cell surfaces or plastic

In a 1-round selection, most recovered phages are these background binders.

⭐ Conceptual solution

Develop helper phage systems that reduce background. (Details skipped in lecture, but the key idea: make phage viability dependent on real antigen binding.)


🧬 3. Cell-Type-Specific Antibodies: Keratinocyte Case Study

🌟 Background

Keratinocytes are epidermal skin cells with differentiation stages (stem-like → differentiated → dead keratin layer).

The goal was to discover cell-type-specific surface markers on living keratinocytes.

📌 The surprising theoretical finding:

When the one-round selection was done:

  • Many antibodies were highly specific to keratinocytes
  • Despite the expectation that most antigens would be common to all cell types

This reveals an important theoretical principle:

⭐ Cell surfaces are far more heterogeneous than we assume

Even cells of similar lineage or tissue origin can have drastically different surface antigen repertoires.


🧬 4. Why an Antibody Can Be Cell-Specific for a Protein That All Cells Have (Plectin Example)

One antibody (B3) pulled down plectin — a cytoskeletal protein every cell expresses.

Yet it bound specifically to keratinocytes. Why?

🎯 Theoretical explanation:

Alternative splicing

  • Plectin has 32 exons → many splice variants
  • Different cell types express different isoforms
  • An antibody can recognize an epitope unique to the keratinocyte-specific splice form

This illustrates the principle:

⭐ One gene ≠ one protein

Surface diversity arises from:

  • isoform variation
  • post-translational modifications
  • differential expression

🧬 5. Discovery of Moonlighting Proteins: Vimentin Outside the Cell

A second selection (young vs old endothelial cells) revealed something shocking:

🎉 Found antigen: Vimentin

Expected location: inside the cell, as an intermediate filament protein.

But the antibody stained the cell surface of old cells.

Theoretical implications:

⭐ Moonlighting proteins

Proteins canonically described as “intracellular” may:

  • Translocate to the cell surface
  • Exist in extracellular form
  • Acquire new functions in migration, virus infection, cancer, angiogenesis, wound healing

⭐ Post-translational modifications matter

Extracellular vimentin had:

  • Lower molecular weight
  • Distinct PTMs These alter structure → expose different epitopes → change function.

🌱 6. Angiogenesis and Cell Behavior Modulation by Surface Proteins

Extracellular vimentin affects:

  • endothelial tube formation
  • cell migration
  • cellular interactions during inflammation and cancer

The theoretical meaning:

⭐ Surface-exposed cytoskeletal proteins can act as signaling molecules, not just structural components.


🧬 7. Cellular Heterogeneity: Why Single-Cell Selection Matters

Real tissues are not uniform. Cells vary due to:

  • microenvironment (e.g., hypoxia near tumor core)
  • differentiation states
  • interactions with immune or stromal cells

⭐ Implication

A selection performed on bulk cultures misses rare but crucial subpopulations.


🔦 8. Theoretical Innovation: Single-Cell Antibody Selection

Two technologies were developed to isolate phages bound to one specific cell:


A. Shadow Stick Selection 🕶️

  • Cells on a slide include mostly normal cells + a few cancer cells
  • A UV-resistant “shadow stick” covers a single cancer cell
  • UV light destroys all other phage DNA
  • Only phages bound to the protected cell survive

Conceptual meaning:

  • “Survival” becomes the readout of specificity
  • You enrich only for antibodies recognizing that individual cell phenotype

B. Aspiration Selection 💧

  • Physical extraction of phage bound to a single identified cell
  • Also allows selection for rare markers

Theoretical impact:

📌 Precision-targeted molecular discovery 📌 Identify markers of rare cancers, fetal cells, or specialized brain cells 📌 No need for whole-cell purification


🧠 9. Pyrocyte (Pericyte) Specificity Example

Pericytes wrap capillaries; they support vessel stability and blood-brain-barrier integrity.

A single-cell selection yielded:

⭐ Antibody C3

  • Highly specific for human brain vascular pericytes
  • Low binding to mouse pericytes
  • Low binding to endothelial or smooth muscle cells

📌 Theoretical meaning:

Cell-type specificity is shaped by:

  • species differences
  • specialized extracellular matrix proteins (e.g., fibronectin variants)
  • microvascular vs macrovascular identity

🧬 10. Fibronectin as a Differentially Exposed Antigen

C3 recognized fibronectin, which is normally ubiquitous.

But pericytes seem to have:

  • a surface-exposed conformation
  • or an isoform preferentially recognized
  • or a unique local microenvironment revealing hidden epitopes

This reinforces the theme:

⭐ Surface proteome is defined not just by what proteins are present, but by:

  • conformation
  • localization
  • cell-type context
  • post-translational processing

🧪 11. Functional Modulation: Antibodies Influence Cell Behavior

Theoretical insight from tube formation + migration assays:

  • Antibody C3 → enhanced angiogenesis-like structures
  • Another fibronectin-binding antibody → no effect
  • Anti-laminin L76 → inhibits angiogenesis

📌 What this proves:

Antibodies are more than markers — they can:

  • activate or inhibit signaling pathways
  • change migration
  • alter angiogenesis-like behaviors

⭐ Conceptual conclusion:

Binding to the same protein does not imply the same biological effect. The epitope targeted determines the downstream signaling outcome.


🎯 12. Overall Theoretical Conclusions

🌟 A. Phage display can discover highly cell-specific antigens

Even when those antigens are “housekeeping” proteins (due to isoforms or PTMs).

🌟 B. Cellular surfaces are extremely heterogeneous

Even within one tissue or cell type.

🌟 C. Many classical intracellular proteins have unexpected extracellular roles

Vimentin and fibronectin illustrate this paradigm shift.

🌟 D. Antibodies can act as functional probes

They don’t just label cells; they modulate signaling, migration, angiogenesis.

🌟 E. Single-cell selection enables discovery of rare, clinically important markers

Useful for:

  • cancer
  • fetal cells
  • brain vasculature
  • personalized diagnostics

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)