The lecturer frames antibodies not just as immune proteins, but as a technology platform that can be applied across many biological problems, as long as those problems can be “combined with antibodies.”
Example application areas mentioned:
Core idea: antibodies are used as highly specific recognition tools to detect, isolate, or target particular cells and molecules across many biological systems.
An antibody (immunoglobulin, Ig) is described structurally and functionally:
You can imagine the classical Y-shape:
Key contrast:
To achieve diverse antigen binding but conserved effector functions, the immune system uses a modular genetic design in B cells.
In your germline DNA (genomic DNA), immunoglobulin genes are split into gene segments:
The constant regions (C) are encoded by other segments (grey in the lecture figure) and are comparatively uniform, so they are not the focus here.
During B-cell development (maturation):
Then:
For the heavy chain, the lecture gives approximate segment counts:
If any combination of V–D–J can be used, the number of possible heavy chain variable regions by simple multiplication is:
There is a similar (but somewhat smaller) combinatorial repertoire for the light chain.
When you consider:
→ You get on the order of ~10⁵ (~100,000) different antibody specificities from combinatorial V(D)J assembly alone.
The lecturer emphasizes: this is actually not that much, given:
So more diversity mechanisms are needed.
V(D)J recombination is not perfectly precise. This imperfection is actually exploited:
When a V segment is joined to a D segment, and D to J, extra nucleotides can be inserted at the junctions.
This process is often referred to as junctional diversity:
Because each recombination event can have different numbers and sequences of inserted nucleotides, junctional diversification can:
So, the total diversity is:
Even millions of naïve antibody variants are sometimes not enough, especially when high affinity and fine specificity are needed (e.g. neutralizing antibodies).
The immune system adds another layer: somatic hypermutation (SHM) and affinity maturation.
Activated B cells then:
Mechanistically:
In germinal centers (specialized structures in lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues):
Over time:
Result:
Despite this sophisticated system, people still get sick:
The lecturer’s research interest is in:
To do this, they need to mimic key aspects of the immune system in vitro.
In the lab:
Thus, antibody engineering projects often:
Even though this is “part 1” of the lecture and doesn’t go deep into detailed protocols yet, it introduces several conceptual experimental approaches where antibodies are used.
The lecturer mentions that to mimic the immune system, they often use:
This is pointing toward display technologies (like phage display), where:
In this part of the lecture, the detailed phage display workflow is not yet explained, but the conceptual point is:
We can partly recreate the B-cell “selection” process using genetic libraries in bacteria/phages and select for binders in vitro.
Concept:
Practical challenge:
Antibody-based solution:
This is an example of rare-cell isolation using antibodies – conceptually similar to immunomagnetic separation or FACS-based enrichment.
The lecturer describes CD36 as:
Research goal:
Conceptual diagnostic use:
So CD36 is used as a biomarker to personalize risk assessment in obesity.
Neurological disease application:
Conceptually, this involves:
Specific methods are not detailed here, but the key experimental theme is:
Use antibody engineering to overcome physiological barriers (like the BBB).
Putting it all together: