Based on Applied Day 2, Part 1
The lecture opens by framing genetics through two complementary strategies:
This theme is used throughout to contrast different genetic tools used to study aging.
C. elegans is described as an “excellent model organism”, and the lecture emphasizes why:
AI humor aside, the lecture stresses that the “best” organism depends on the question.
This link between dauer signaling and adult longevity is one of the core reasons C. elegans is central in aging research.
C. elegans has 959 somatic cells in the adult hermaphrodite. Every lineage is invariant.
Because tissues are transparent and invariant, cellular changes can be tracked throughout life.
C. elegans exhibits measurable behaviors:
Behavior = powerful phenotype for genetic screens.
This is one of the richest theoretical sections.
The lecture emphasizes that screens are the most powerful aspect of C. elegans biology due to speed, cost, and scalability.
The lecture briefly compares organisms:
Aim: highlight how lifespan and evolutionary distance influence the type of aging research possible.
Zebrafish example: Nearly 3-year lifespan → experiments are slow. Worms: weeks, enabling rapid discovery.
Worms have repeatedly served as the birthplace of major genetic discoveries.
The lecture briefly lists community tools:
These serve as essential infrastructure for modern C. elegans research.
C. elegans aging research is strongly linked to the dauer stage. Why is dauer biology so informative for understanding aging? (Answer in 1–2 sentences, then I can confirm and build on it.)