Researchers use genetic tricks (disrupting, overexpressing, or moving genes to model fungi like Aspergillus) to link BGCs to their products. Examples:
👉 Functional genomics = treasure hunting in fungal DNA for hidden weapons.
Fungal SMs don’t just hurt plants, they interact across species:
Entomopathogenic fungi also use SMs:
👉 SMs = both weapons and behavioral “mind-control” tools.
Looking at just one fungal isolate is misleading. Different isolates in a species can have very different BGCs.
👉 Lesson: you must study populations, not single references, to understand SM evolution and pathogenicity.
✅ In short: fungal pathogens are chemical geniuses, using secondary metabolites as toxins, antibiotics, stress protectors, and even mind-control molecules. Functional genomics finds these molecules, and population genomics shows how they evolve across different fungal strains and environments.
Got it — let’s unpack each word one by one in the context of the article. I’ll keep it clear and connected to the fungal SM story 🍄
👉 The authors mention all these terms because they’re building the story: