This lecture is SUPER important because it explains how we actually solve the phase problem and build models in macromolecular crystallography.
Think of the workflow like this:
π Diffraction β Intensities β Phases β Electron density β Model building
This lecture focuses mainly on how to get phases.
The Patterson function is:
A convolution of the electron density with itself β giving an interatomic vector map.
Mathematically it is calculated using only measured intensities |F|Β², so:
β Phases are NOT needed This is extremely powerful.
So even though we cannot calculate electron density directly (because we lack phases), we can calculate a Patterson map.
It shows:
π Vectors between atoms (distance + direction) Not the actual atom positions.
Key properties:
This means:
β‘οΈ Peaks always come in pairs β‘οΈ Map is more complex than electron density
These diagrams show:
For:
Vectors:
Total peaks:
2^2 - 2 +1 = 3
Now many more vectors appear:
Total peaks:
3^2 - 3 +1 = 7
π§ Important takeaway:
Patterson maps become extremely crowded for macromolecules β difficult interpretation.
To solve phases via isomorphous replacement, we need:
π Positions of heavy atoms
But we cannot directly calculate their structure factors.
Instead we use:
Delta F_ = |F_| - |F_P|
A Patterson using ΞFisoΒ² approximates heavy-atom Patterson (half-scale).
Peak height depends on electron number product:
Thus:
β Heavy atoms dominate Patterson maps β makes them easier to locate.
Symmetry operations create special planes in Patterson space called:
π Harker sections
Example shown:
These restrict possible heavy-atom coordinates β makes solving easier.
By analysing peaks in:
Heavy atom positions determined:
Important crystallographic ideas here:
β Origin can be shifted β Symmetry operations generate equivalent solutions β Hand ambiguity possible
Instead of heavy atoms, use:
π A known homologous structure (search model)
We rotate and translate this model in the unit cell until:
β‘οΈ Calculated diffraction matches observed diffraction.
Then phases come from:
F_
The diagram shows:
Thus:
β First step = rotation search β Second step = translation search
Also:
Rotation function compares:
Best overlap β correct orientation.
Parameters affecting success:
If radius too large:
β intermolecular vectors contaminate signal.
Now we fix orientation and move model around.
Translation affects:
π Intermolecular vectors only
We compare predicted Patterson with observed β best match gives position.
The image slide shows:
Atomic scattering factor:
f = f_0 + f' + i f''
Graph shows:
This corresponds to:
β Maximum anomalous signal.
These allow:
SAD uses:
F^+ eq F^-
Because anomalous scatterers break Friedel symmetry.
But:
β There is phase ambiguity β two possible solutions.
To improve maps:
The slide image shows:
π messy density β clearer helical features after modification.
Main approaches:
1οΈβ£ Molecular replacement 2οΈβ£ Isomorphous replacement (heavy atoms) 3οΈβ£ Anomalous scattering (SAD/MAD) 4οΈβ£ Dispersive differences
β Patterson = vector map β no phases needed β Heavy atoms dominate Patterson peaks β Harker sections reduce dimensionality β MR uses orientation (rotation function) then position (translation function) β SAD uses anomalous differences β phase ambiguity β Density modification crucial for usable maps