Lecture 5 PPT

Protein structure

Protein NMR Beyond Structure – Reinhard Wimmer

This lecture explains how NMR is used not just to determine structure β€” but to study function, dynamics, binding, folding, and energetics.


🧭 OVERVIEW

The lecture is divided into:

  • Part I – Introduction
  • Part IIA – Ligand binding by chemical shift perturbation
  • Part IIB – Hydrogen/Deuterium exchange
  • Part III – Ligand binding from NOEs
  • Part IV – Ligand binding from the ligand perspective (STD-NMR)
  • Part V – Protein dynamics
  • Part VI – Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE)
  • Part VII – pKa values & protein folding

🟒 PART I – INTRODUCTION

πŸ“„ Page 1 – Title

Introduction to using Protein NMR beyond structure determination.


πŸ“„ Page 2 – The Workflow of NMR Studies

The classical structure determination path:

  1. Sample preparation
  2. Resonance assignment
  3. NOEs & couplings
  4. Structure calculation

➑️ This consumes huge NMR time and computer time.

But once structure is known β†’ NMR can study:

  • Function
  • Dynamics
  • Mechanism

πŸ“„ Page 3 – What Can NMR Study?

Beyond structure:

  • Ligand binding
  • Molecular dynamics
  • Protein folding
  • pKa values
  • Hydrogen exchange

Each topic corresponds to later lecture parts.


πŸ“„ Page 4 – Protein–Ligand Interactions

Methods listed:

  • Protein–ligand NOEs (stable complexes only)
  • Chemical shift changes
  • Hydrogen exchange changes
  • PREs
  • Saturation transfer (ligand-focused)

Important concept: Different NMR observables report on different aspects of binding.


πŸ“„ Page 5 – 15N-HSQC: The β€œPower Tool” πŸ”₯

The HSQC spectrum:

  • X-axis: 1H
  • Y-axis: 15N
  • One peak per backbone NH (mostly)

This is a fingerprint of the protein.

The image shows:

  • Structure of a protein
  • Corresponding HSQC

Key idea: If something changes in structure or environment β†’ peaks move.


πŸ“„ Page 6 – Take-Home Messages

NMR can study:

  • Binding thermodynamics
  • Structural aspects
  • Molecular motion
  • Folding
  • pKa

HSQC = extremely sensitive probe of environment changes.


🟑 PART IIA – CHEMICAL SHIFT PERTURBATION (CSP)

πŸ“„ Page 7 – Title


πŸ“„ Page 8 – Concept of CSP

Chemical shift reflects:

  • Time-averaged local electronic environment

When ligand binds: β†’ Local environment changes β†’ Chemical shifts change

So: Map shifted residues β†’ identify binding site.


πŸ“„ Page 9 – Binding Thermodynamics Refresher

Reaction: P + L β‡Œ PL

Parameters:

  • kon (binding rate)
  • koff (dissociation rate)
  • Ka = kon/koff
  • Kd = 1/Ka

Diffusion-limited kon β‰ˆ 10⁷ M⁻¹s⁻¹.

If conformational change required β†’ slower.


πŸ“„ Page 10 – Experimental Setup

Add ligand β†’ record HSQC.

Outcomes:

  • No change β†’ no binding
  • Peak shifts β†’ binding
  • Map shifts β†’ binding site
  • Fit shifts β†’ estimate Kd

πŸ“„ Pages 11–12 – Chemical Exchange Regimes

Important NMR concept.

Exchange rate (kex) compared to chemical shift difference (Δν):

1️⃣ Slow exchange (kex << Δν)

  • Two peaks visible

2️⃣ Fast exchange (kex >> Δν)

  • One peak moving

3️⃣ Intermediate exchange

  • Peak broadening / disappearance

πŸ“„ Pages 13–14 – Visual Examples

Page 13: Slow exchange spectra at different ligand ratios: Separate free and bound peaks.

Page 14: Fast exchange titration: Peaks gradually shift position.


πŸ“„ Page 15 – Ligand Titration Curves

Strong binding:

  • Steep curve
  • Saturates quickly

Weak binding:

  • Gradual curve

Important: CSP works best for Kd > 0.1 mM.


πŸ“„ Pages 16–17 – Calculating Ka

In fast exchange:

Δδobs / Δδbound = fraction bound

Using binding equations for 1:1 complex: You can solve for Ka.

Key insight: Chemical shifts can quantify thermodynamics.


πŸ“„ Pages 18–23 – Case Study: Plectasin

Study: How does antimicrobial peptide plectasin bind lipid II?

Steps:

  1. Add DPC micelles (membrane mimic)
  2. Observe binding
  3. Add lipid II

Findings:

  • One hydrophobic end inserts into micelle
  • Lipid II binds in semi-ring around protein
  • Chemical shift mapping shows binding surface

Ξ”G = βˆ’27 kJ/mol.


πŸ“„ Page 24 – CSP Pros & Cons

Advantages:

  • Simple
  • No complex theory
  • Gives Ka
  • Works for all exchange regimes

Disadvantages:

  • No structural detail
  • Secondary effects cause shifts
  • Not a structure of complex

Rule: Binding site + neighboring residues always shift.


🟠 PART IIB – H/D EXCHANGE

πŸ“„ Pages 25–26 – Concept

Amide hydrogens exchange with solvent.

In D2O: NH β†’ ND Peak disappears in HSQC.

Exchange rate depends strongly on pH.


πŸ“„ Page 27 – HSQC Visibility

Visible: NH Invisible: ND

Thus: Loss of peak intensity reports exchange.


πŸ“„ Page 28 – Experimental Setup

  1. Freeze-dry protein
  2. Dissolve in D2O
  3. Record HSQC over time
  4. Monitor intensity decay

πŸ“„ Page 29 – Protection Factor

Hydrogen bonds protect NH from exchange.

Protection factor = observed / expected rate.

High protection indicates:

  • Secondary structure
  • Burial
  • Ligand binding

πŸ“„ Pages 30–31 – Binding Surface Example

CBP21 + chitin

Observation: Certain residues protected upon substrate binding.

Mapped onto structure: Defines substrate binding surface.


πŸ“„ Page 32 – Take-Home Messages

H/D exchange useful for:

  • Detecting secondary structure
  • Detecting ligand epitopes
  • Studying folding

πŸ”΄ PART III – NOEs FOR LIGAND BINDING

πŸ“„ Pages 33–34

NOEs between protein and ligand: β†’ Provide distance restraints β†’ Can determine structure of complex

Requires: Stable complex (high Ka, slow dissociation).


πŸ“„ Pages 35–36 – Example

Fatty acid binding protein: NOEs define precise orientation of fatty acid.


πŸ“„ Page 37 – Take-Home

NOEs = structural information But only if binding strong enough.


🟣 PART IV – STD-NMR (Ligand Perspective)

πŸ“„ Pages 38–40 – Saturation Transfer

Saturate protein resonance. Saturation spreads via spin diffusion. Transfers to ligand in contact.

Ligand dissociates: Carries saturation with it.


πŸ“„ Pages 41–43 – Example: NAβ‚‚ & RCA120

STD spectrum shows: Strong signals = ligand atoms closest to protein.

Weak/no signal = far from protein.

Thus: Maps ligand binding epitope.


πŸ“„ Page 44 – STD Summary

Advantages:

  • No protein assignment needed
  • Works at low purity
  • No isotope labeling required

Limitation: Gives no protein information.


πŸ”΅ PART V – PROTEIN DYNAMICS

πŸ“„ Pages 45–47 – Timescales

Protein motions:

10⁻¹² s – side chain rotation 10⁻¹⁰–10⁻¹¹ s – loop motions 10⁻⁹–10⁻⁸ s – overall tumbling 10⁻⁷–10⁻³ s – slow breathing


πŸ“„ Page 48 – Model-Free Approach

Parameters:

  • Overall tumbling (Ο„m)
  • Order parameter SΒ² (0–1)

SΒ² = 1 β†’ rigid SΒ² = 0 β†’ fully flexible


πŸ“„ Page 49 – T1 & T2

T1, T2 relaxation: Depend on mobility.

T1/T2 ratio estimates tumbling.


πŸ“„ Pages 50–54 – Case Study: Calmodulin

Mutation F141L:

  • Increases flexibility in C-lobe
  • Linker region extended

Measured using: 15N{1H}-NOE.


πŸ“„ Page 55 – Take-Home

Relaxation measures:

  • Overall motion
  • Internal flexibility

NOE distinguishes rigid vs flexible regions.


🟀 PART VI – PRE

πŸ“„ Pages 56–61 – Basics

Paramagnetic centers (unpaired electrons) β†’ Strong magnetic moment β†’ Enhance relaxation β†’ Signal attenuation

PRE ∝ r⁻⁢ (distance dependent)


πŸ“„ Pages 62–67 – Theory

PRE arises from:

  • Dipole–dipole interactions
  • Electron–nucleus interactions

Requires:

  • Paramagnetic label (Gd³⁺, Mn²⁺, nitroxide)
  • Diamagnetic control

πŸ“„ Pages 68–72 – Example: Anoplin

Measured PRE distances in micelle. Determined insertion depth.

PDB 2MJQ.


πŸ“„ Pages 73–77 – Transient Complexes

PRE detects: Very low-populated states (~0.5%).

Example: Multiple transient geometries explain PRE data.


πŸ“„ Pages 78–79 – PRE Summary

PRE useful for:

  • Long-range constraints
  • Solvent accessibility
  • Transient states

Analogy: Like fluorescence quenching.


🟑 PART VII – pKa & Folding

πŸ“„ Pages 80–82 – pKa by NMR

Monitor chemical shifts vs pH.

Protonation changes shift. Fit curve β†’ get pKa of individual residues.

Example: Active-site His in cutinase.


πŸ“„ Pages 83–84 – Real-Time Folding

Most proteins fold too fast for NMR.

Rare slow folder: Apoplastocyanin.

Observed folding over hours.


πŸ“„ Pages 85–86 – Quenched-Flow NMR

Strategy: Allow folding for defined time. Trigger H/D exchange. Freeze state. Measure protection.

Snapshots of intermediates.


πŸ“„ Pages 87–89 – Folding Example

Human fibroblast growth factor.

Observation: As folding time increases: More H-bonds form. Less exchange. HSQC intensity decreases.


🎯 FINAL TAKE-HOME

Protein NMR can study:

βœ… Ligand binding (CSP, NOE, STD) βœ… Binding thermodynamics βœ… Binding epitopes βœ… Protein dynamics (T1, T2, NOE) βœ… Paramagnetic long-range effects βœ… pKa values βœ… Folding intermediates

HSQC remains the central tool throughout.

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)