A very important concept in cryo-EM is that the detector pixel size determines the theoretical resolution.
This comes from the Nyquist sampling theorem — you must sample at least twice per feature size.
👉 Meaning:
So:
This is a detector sampling limit, not a physical electron wavelength limit (electron wavelength is picometer → much smaller).
Even if microscope settings are perfect:
Sample quality determines real resolution
Important factors:
Thus:
Resolution is ALWAYS limited by the weakest link — usually the sample.
Cryo-EM convention:
Resolution = frequency where FSC = 0.143
This empirical threshold was derived by comparing cryo-EM maps with crystallographic maps.
Signal fades into noise at high frequency → defines resolution limit.
When imaging in cryo-EM:
These rings describe the Contrast Transfer Function (CTF).
By fitting theoretical CTF to experimental image:
You determine:
Accurate CTF estimation is essential for high-resolution reconstruction.
If CTF is wrong:
Heavy metal salts (e.g. uranyl acetate) surround the protein.
Electrons interacting with heavy atoms:
Electrons passing through protein:
Result:
Protein appears bright on dark background → “negative image”.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
These two beams:
Interfere as waves at the detector.
This wave interference between direct beam and scattered beam generates phase contrast.
Important:
Cryo-EM intentionally uses defocus:
Each particle image is:
A 2D projection of a 3D object
Different orientations → different projection shapes.
Steps:
Benefits:
Key theoretical idea:
Thus:
This is the basis of single-particle reconstruction.
If particles freeze mainly in one orientation:
Solution:
Very important conceptual difference.
Thus:
Cryo-EM map = electrostatic potential map
Not strictly the same as electron density.
This affects: