[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1576},["ShallowReactive",2],{"mdc--id7lc2-key":3},{"data":4,"body":5},{},{"type":6,"children":7},"root",[8,25,32,67,71,77,134,137,143,155,183,188,276,286,305,308,314,322,355,365,400,405,430,433,439,451,458,470,490,495,518,524,536,582,585,591,602,607,654,659,698,708,711,717,728,755,760,787,790,796,801,807,812,839,850,856,900,906,939,942,948,973,978,1005,1008,1014,1019,1034,1039,1073,1078,1100,1105,1124,1127,1133,1138,1157,1162,1194,1199,1204,1245,1248,1254,1259,1287,1292,1327,1332,1353,1358,1373,1378,1393,1398,1421,1426,1470,1473,1479],{"type":9,"tag":10,"props":11,"children":13},"element","h2",{"id":12},"chapter-311-why-nmr-structures-detailed-summary",[14,17,23],{"type":15,"value":16},"text","Chapter 3.1.1 — ",{"type":9,"tag":18,"props":19,"children":20},"em",{},[21],{"type":15,"value":22},"Why NMR Structures?",{"type":15,"value":24}," 🧲🧬 (detailed summary)",{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":27,"children":29},"h3",{"id":28},"big-picture-what-makes-nmr-special",[30],{"type":15,"value":31},"Big picture: what makes NMR special?",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":34,"children":35},"p",{},[36,38,44,46,51,53,58,60,65],{"type":15,"value":37},"NMR is valuable in structural biology because it gives ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":40,"children":41},"strong",{},[42],{"type":15,"value":43},"both structure and dynamics",{"type":15,"value":45}," in conditions that often resemble a protein’s ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":47,"children":48},{},[49],{"type":15,"value":50},"physiological (solution) environment",{"type":15,"value":52},". Unlike a single “best” structure, an NMR structure is typically an ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":54,"children":55},{},[56],{"type":15,"value":57},"ensemble",{"type":15,"value":59}," of conformers that all satisfy the experimental restraints—this naturally aligns with the fact that proteins can be ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":61,"children":62},{},[63],{"type":15,"value":64},"dynamic",{"type":15,"value":66}," rather than rigid.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":69,"children":70},"hr",{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":72,"children":74},{"id":73},"a-quick-historical-anchor-why-the-method-mattered-early-on",[75],{"type":15,"value":76},"A quick historical anchor (why the method mattered early on)",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":79,"children":80},"ul",{},[81,108],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":83,"children":84},"li",{},[85,87,92,94,99,101,106],{"type":15,"value":86},"The ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":88,"children":89},{},[90],{"type":15,"value":91},"first NMR solution structure",{"type":15,"value":93}," of a biological macromolecule was solved in ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":95,"children":96},{},[97],{"type":15,"value":98},"1984",{"type":15,"value":100}," (Wüthrich and coworkers) for a ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":102,"children":103},{},[104],{"type":15,"value":105},"57–amino acid",{"type":15,"value":107}," proteinase inhibitor IIA from bull seminal plasma.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":109,"children":110},{},[111,113,118,120,125,127,132],{"type":15,"value":112},"NMR’s value was strongly reinforced when the ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":114,"children":115},{},[116],{"type":15,"value":117},"solution NMR structure",{"type":15,"value":119}," of ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":121,"children":122},{},[123],{"type":15,"value":124},"rat metallothionein-2",{"type":15,"value":126}," showed that an available ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":128,"children":129},{},[130],{"type":15,"value":131},"crystal structure needed revision",{"type":15,"value":133},"—a key early example of NMR revealing that “crystal ≠ solution reality” in some cases.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":135,"children":136},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":138,"children":140},{"id":139},"where-nmr-sits-among-the-big-three-structure-methods",[141],{"type":15,"value":142},"Where NMR sits among the “big three” structure methods 🧩",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":144,"children":145},{},[146,148,153],{"type":15,"value":147},"The chapter frames structural biology around three main experimental approaches (highlighted in the ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":149,"children":150},{},[151],{"type":15,"value":152},"pie chart on page 2",{"type":15,"value":154},", Fig. 3.1.1):",{"type":9,"tag":156,"props":157,"children":158},"ol",{},[159,167,175],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":160,"children":161},{},[162],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":163,"children":164},{},[165],{"type":15,"value":166},"X-ray crystallography",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":168,"children":169},{},[170],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":171,"children":172},{},[173],{"type":15,"value":174},"Solution NMR",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":176,"children":177},{},[178],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":179,"children":180},{},[181],{"type":15,"value":182},"Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM)",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":184,"children":185},{},[186],{"type":15,"value":187},"Key takeaways:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":189,"children":190},{},[191,208,232,257],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":192,"children":193},{},[194,199,201,206],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":195,"children":196},{},[197],{"type":15,"value":198},"X-ray and NMR",{"type":15,"value":200}," are the two main ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":202,"children":203},{},[204],{"type":15,"value":205},"atomic-level",{"type":15,"value":207}," methods in routine use for biomolecules (in crystals vs solution).",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":209,"children":210},{},[211,216,218,223,225,230],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":212,"children":213},{},[214],{"type":15,"value":215},"Cryo-EM",{"type":15,"value":217}," is increasingly important for ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":219,"children":220},{},[221],{"type":15,"value":222},"very large assemblies",{"type":15,"value":224}," (ribosome, microtubules, viruses), and methodological advances have pushed its “routine” applicability down to around ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":226,"children":227},{},[228],{"type":15,"value":229},"~200 kDa",{"type":15,"value":231},".",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":233,"children":234},{},[235,237,242,244,249,251,256],{"type":15,"value":236},"Cryo-EM often has ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":238,"children":239},{},[240],{"type":15,"value":241},"lower resolution",{"type":15,"value":243}," than X-ray, but may capture ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":245,"children":246},{},[247],{"type":15,"value":248},"more biologically relevant conformations",{"type":15,"value":250}," because it avoids ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":252,"children":253},{},[254],{"type":15,"value":255},"crystal lattice constraints",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":258,"children":259},{},[260,262,267,269,274],{"type":15,"value":261},"Methods can be ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":263,"children":264},{},[265],{"type":15,"value":266},"combined",{"type":15,"value":268},": atomic structures (X-ray or NMR) of components can be ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":270,"children":271},{},[272],{"type":15,"value":273},"docked into cryo-EM maps",{"type":15,"value":275}," to build pseudo-atomic models and identify contact interfaces.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":277,"children":278},{},[279,284],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":280,"children":281},{},[282],{"type":15,"value":283},"Figure 3.1.2 (page 2)",{"type":15,"value":285}," gives a key “size preference” message via the bar chart:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":287,"children":288},{},[289,297],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":290,"children":291},{},[292],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":293,"children":294},{},[295],{"type":15,"value":296},"NMR is preferentially used for low molecular weight systems",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":298,"children":299},{},[300],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":301,"children":302},{},[303],{"type":15,"value":304},"Cryo-EM is preferentially used for very large assemblies",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":306,"children":307},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":309,"children":311},{"id":310},"practicaltechnical-differences-what-each-method-needs-and-what-it-sees",[312],{"type":15,"value":313},"Practical/technical differences: what each method “needs” and what it “sees”",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":315,"children":316},{},[317],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":318,"children":319},{},[320],{"type":15,"value":321},"Hydrogens:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":323,"children":324},{},[325,343],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":326,"children":327},{},[328,330,335,337,342],{"type":15,"value":329},"NMR restraints (like distance restraints) often ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":331,"children":332},{},[333],{"type":15,"value":334},"explicitly involve hydrogen positions",{"type":15,"value":336},", so ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":338,"children":339},{},[340],{"type":15,"value":341},"H atoms are typically included in NMR PDB coordinate files",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":344,"children":345},{},[346,348,353],{"type":15,"value":347},"X-ray structures usually ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":349,"children":350},{},[351],{"type":15,"value":352},"don’t include hydrogens",{"type":15,"value":354}," in coordinate files because diffraction is dominated by heavier atoms and hydrogens are not directly seen in typical data.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":356,"children":357},{},[358,363],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":359,"children":360},{},[361],{"type":15,"value":362},"Sample requirements (surprisingly similar):",{"type":15,"value":364},"\nFor both NMR and X-ray you generally need protein samples that are:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":366,"children":367},{},[368,376,384,392],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":369,"children":370},{},[371],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":372,"children":373},{},[374],{"type":15,"value":375},"homogeneous",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":377,"children":378},{},[379],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":380,"children":381},{},[382],{"type":15,"value":383},"stable for days/weeks",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":385,"children":386},{},[387],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":388,"children":389},{},[390],{"type":15,"value":391},"soluble enough",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":393,"children":394},{},[395],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":396,"children":397},{},[398],{"type":15,"value":399},"not irreversibly aggregated at high concentration",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":401,"children":402},{},[403],{"type":15,"value":404},"Even if you meet these, you still can’t be sure you’ll get:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":406,"children":407},{},[408,420],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":409,"children":410},{},[411,413,418],{"type":15,"value":412},"crystals that ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":414,"children":415},{},[416],{"type":15,"value":417},"diffract well",{"type":15,"value":419},", or",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":421,"children":422},{},[423,425],{"type":15,"value":424},"NMR spectra good enough for ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":426,"children":427},{},[428],{"type":15,"value":429},"structure determination",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":431,"children":432},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":434,"children":436},{"id":435},"nmr-as-a-screening-tool-for-crystallography-️",[437],{"type":15,"value":438},"NMR as a screening tool for crystallography 🧪➡️🧊",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":440,"children":441},{},[442,444,449],{"type":15,"value":443},"Because broad requirements overlap, NMR has been used to ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":445,"children":446},{},[447],{"type":15,"value":448},"screen protein samples",{"type":15,"value":450}," to identify ones more likely to crystallize well.",{"type":9,"tag":452,"props":453,"children":455},"h4",{"id":454},"_1d-h-nmr-screening-idea",[456],{"type":15,"value":457},"1D ¹H NMR screening idea",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":459,"children":460},{},[461,463,468],{"type":15,"value":462},"The chapter notes that ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":464,"children":465},{},[466],{"type":15,"value":467},"¹H 1D spectra",{"type":15,"value":469}," can categorize proteins into groups that:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":471,"children":472},{},[473,478],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":474,"children":475},{},[476],{"type":15,"value":477},"crystallize with similar success rates,",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":479,"children":480},{},[481,483,488],{"type":15,"value":482},"but differ in the ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":484,"children":485},{},[486],{"type":15,"value":487},"quality of diffraction",{"type":15,"value":489}," the crystals provide.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":491,"children":492},{},[493],{"type":15,"value":494},"Better diffraction tends to come from proteins whose ¹H spectra show:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":496,"children":497},{},[498,508],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":499,"children":500},{},[501,506],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":502,"children":503},{},[504],{"type":15,"value":505},"higher chemical shift dispersion",{"type":15,"value":507}," (suggesting a defined tertiary structure),",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":509,"children":510},{},[511,516],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":512,"children":513},{},[514],{"type":15,"value":515},"narrower linewidths",{"type":15,"value":517}," (arguing against conformational exchange/equilibria).",{"type":9,"tag":452,"props":519,"children":521},{"id":520},"hsqc-as-the-workhorse-screen-and-why",[522],{"type":15,"value":523},"HSQC as the workhorse screen (and why)",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":525,"children":526},{},[527,529,534],{"type":15,"value":528},"A central concept here is the ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":530,"children":531},{},[532],{"type":15,"value":533},"¹H–¹⁵N HSQC",{"type":15,"value":535}," spectrum:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":537,"children":538},{},[539,558,570],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":540,"children":541},{},[542,544,549,551,556],{"type":15,"value":543},"It gives a ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":545,"children":546},{},[547],{"type":15,"value":548},"2D map",{"type":15,"value":550}," where (ideally) you see ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":552,"children":553},{},[554],{"type":15,"value":555},"one peak per backbone amide",{"type":15,"value":557}," (except prolines).",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":559,"children":560},{},[561,563,568],{"type":15,"value":562},"¹⁵N labeling is ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":564,"children":565},{},[566],{"type":15,"value":567},"relatively affordable",{"type":15,"value":569},", making HSQC-based screening feasible.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":571,"children":572},{},[573,575,580],{"type":15,"value":574},"HSQC can guide ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":576,"children":577},{},[578],{"type":15,"value":579},"rational construct design",{"type":15,"value":581}," (domain boundaries, trimming flexible ends/loops) before crystallization trials, improving chances of crystallization success.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":583,"children":584},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":586,"children":588},{"id":587},"key-point-nmr-spectral-quality-guaranteed-crystallography-success-️",[589],{"type":15,"value":590},"Key point: NMR spectral quality ≠ guaranteed crystallography success ⚠️",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":592,"children":593},{},[594,596,601],{"type":15,"value":595},"The chapter is explicit that correlation exists, but it is ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":597,"children":598},{},[599],{"type":15,"value":600},"not stringent",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":603,"children":604},{},[605],{"type":15,"value":606},"Two example findings:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":608,"children":609},{},[610,635],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":611,"children":612},{},[613,615,620,621,626,628,633],{"type":15,"value":614},"In one study (159 proteins), only about ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":616,"children":617},{},[618],{"type":15,"value":619},"~20%",{"type":15,"value":119},{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":622,"children":623},{},[624],{"type":15,"value":625},"high-resolution X-ray structures",{"type":15,"value":627}," came from samples with ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":629,"children":630},{},[631],{"type":15,"value":632},"excellent/good HSQC",{"type":15,"value":634}," spectra.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":636,"children":637},{},[638,640,645,647,652],{"type":15,"value":639},"Surprisingly, ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":641,"children":642},{},[643],{"type":15,"value":644},"~33%",{"type":15,"value":646}," of proteins with ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":648,"children":649},{},[650],{"type":15,"value":651},"lower-quality but still “promising” HSQC",{"type":15,"value":653}," spectra could still yield successful X-ray structures.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":655,"children":656},{},[657],{"type":15,"value":658},"Another study (263 proteins) found:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":660,"children":661},{},[662,688,693],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":663,"children":664},{},[665,667,672,674,679,681,686],{"type":15,"value":666},"only ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":668,"children":669},{},[670],{"type":15,"value":671},"21/263 (~8%)",{"type":15,"value":673}," were amenable to ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":675,"children":676},{},[677],{"type":15,"value":678},"both",{"type":15,"value":680}," NMR and X-ray based on HSQC + optimized crystallization trials,\nbut using both methods in parallel increased the total “solvable” targets to ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":682,"children":683},{},[684],{"type":15,"value":685},"107/263 (~41%)",{"type":15,"value":687},", split roughly as:",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":689,"children":690},{},[691],{"type":15,"value":692},"43 NMR-only",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":694,"children":695},{},[696],{"type":15,"value":697},"43 X-ray-only\n(and the remainder being the overlap/other outcomes described in the text).",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":699,"children":700},{},[701,706],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":702,"children":703},{},[704],{"type":15,"value":705},"Interpretation (as given in the text): strong complementarity.",{"type":15,"value":707},"\nSome proteins are simply better suited to one method than the other even if they look “good” by shared criteria (solubility/monodispersion).",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":709,"children":710},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":712,"children":714},{"id":713},"why-would-a-protein-be-nmr-friendly-but-crystal-hostile",[715],{"type":15,"value":716},"Why would a protein be “NMR-friendly” but “crystal-hostile”?",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":718,"children":719},{},[720,722,727],{"type":15,"value":721},"A major reason proposed: ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":723,"children":724},{},[725],{"type":15,"value":726},"highly flexible or unstructured regions",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":729,"children":730},{},[731,743],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":732,"children":733},{},[734,736,741],{"type":15,"value":735},"These regions may ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":737,"children":738},{},[739],{"type":15,"value":740},"not wreck NMR spectra",{"type":15,"value":742}," as badly,",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":744,"children":745},{},[746,748,753],{"type":15,"value":747},"but can be ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":749,"children":750},{},[751],{"type":15,"value":752},"extremely adverse to crystallization",{"type":15,"value":754}," (crystals often require a consistent, well-packed arrangement).",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":756,"children":757},{},[758],{"type":15,"value":759},"Construct redesign can sometimes help:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":761,"children":762},{},[763,775],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":764,"children":765},{},[766,768,773],{"type":15,"value":767},"If unstructured parts are at ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":769,"children":770},{},[771],{"type":15,"value":772},"termini",{"type":15,"value":774},", you may remove them.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":776,"children":777},{},[778,780,785],{"type":15,"value":779},"If they’re internal (e.g., a ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":781,"children":782},{},[783],{"type":15,"value":784},"long loop between secondary structure elements",{"type":15,"value":786},"), redesign may be difficult or impossible.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":788,"children":789},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":791,"children":793},{"id":792},"how-to-read-hsqc-spectra-as-a-foldingquality-report",[794],{"type":15,"value":795},"How to “read” HSQC spectra as a folding/quality report 📈",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":797,"children":798},{},[799],{"type":15,"value":800},"Figure 3.1.3 (page 4) is central here: it shows three HSQC patterns that correspond to different folding states.",{"type":9,"tag":452,"props":802,"children":804},{"id":803},"a-simple-quantitative-metric",[805],{"type":15,"value":806},"A simple quantitative metric",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":808,"children":809},{},[810],{"type":15,"value":811},"You can evaluate HSQC quality by:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":813,"children":814},{},[815,827],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":816,"children":817},{},[818,820,825],{"type":15,"value":819},"counting the number of ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":821,"children":822},{},[823],{"type":15,"value":824},"well-detectable",{"type":15,"value":826}," (intense, well-resolved) backbone amide peaks,",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":828,"children":829},{},[830,832,837],{"type":15,"value":831},"comparing that count to the number of ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":833,"children":834},{},[835],{"type":15,"value":836},"non-Pro residues",{"type":15,"value":838}," in the sequence.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":840,"children":841},{},[842,844,849],{"type":15,"value":843},"This gives an estimate of how many residues are in ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":845,"children":846},{},[847],{"type":15,"value":848},"folded regions",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":452,"props":851,"children":853},{"id":852},"what-different-features-mean",[854],{"type":15,"value":855},"What different features mean",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":857,"children":858},{},[859,876],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":860,"children":861},{},[862,867,869,874],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":863,"children":864},{},[865],{"type":15,"value":866},"Weak minor peaks",{"type":15,"value":868}," and/or ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":870,"children":871},{},[872],{"type":15,"value":873},"broad peaks collapsed near the center",{"type":15,"value":875}," indicate regions lacking a defined 3D structure.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":877,"children":878},{},[879,884,886,891,893,898],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":880,"children":881},{},[882],{"type":15,"value":883},"More peaks than expected",{"type":15,"value":885}," can indicate ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":887,"children":888},{},[889],{"type":15,"value":890},"multiple conformations",{"type":15,"value":892}," that interconvert ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":894,"children":895},{},[896],{"type":15,"value":897},"slowly on the chemical shift timescale",{"type":15,"value":899}," (so you see separate sets rather than one averaged peak).",{"type":9,"tag":452,"props":901,"children":903},{"id":902},"the-three-hsqc-fingerprints-fig-313",[904],{"type":15,"value":905},"The three HSQC “fingerprints” (Fig. 3.1.3)",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":907,"children":908},{},[909,919,929],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":910,"children":911},{},[912,917],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":913,"children":914},{},[915],{"type":15,"value":916},"(a) Fully folded protein:",{"type":15,"value":918}," sharp, intense peaks; wide chemical shift dispersion; number of backbone amide peaks matches expectation.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":920,"children":921},{},[922,927],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":923,"children":924},{},[925],{"type":15,"value":926},"(b) Partially unfolded:",{"type":15,"value":928}," reduced dispersion (especially in ¹H); intense peaks become broad and cluster around ~8.5 ppm (random-coil-like); peaks outside are weak.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":930,"children":931},{},[932,937],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":933,"children":934},{},[935],{"type":15,"value":936},"(c) Unfolded:",{"type":15,"value":938}," almost all backbone amide resonances collapse into a narrow band around ~8.3 ppm; even side-chain NH₂ pairs (Gln/Asn) lose resolution as unfolding increases.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":940,"children":941},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":943,"children":945},{"id":944},"no-scientific-reason-to-always-prefer-x-ray-or-nmr",[946],{"type":15,"value":947},"No “scientific” reason to always prefer X-ray or NMR 🧠",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":949,"children":950},{},[951,953,958,960,965,967,972],{"type":15,"value":952},"The authors argue there is ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":954,"children":955},{},[956],{"type":15,"value":957},"no a priori scientific reason",{"type":15,"value":959}," to prefer one technique for a protein target. The choice is often ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":961,"children":962},{},[963],{"type":15,"value":964},"practical/feasibility-based",{"type":15,"value":966},", and the methods are ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":968,"children":969},{},[970],{"type":15,"value":971},"complementary",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":974,"children":975},{},[976],{"type":15,"value":977},"Practical considerations mentioned:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":979,"children":980},{},[981,993],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":982,"children":983},{},[984,986,991],{"type":15,"value":985},"NMR structure determination has historically been ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":987,"children":988},{},[989],{"type":15,"value":990},"less automated",{"type":15,"value":992}," than X-ray pipelines (though automation exists and is discussed elsewhere in the book).",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":994,"children":995},{},[996,998,1003],{"type":15,"value":997},"NMR generally requires ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":999,"children":1000},{},[1001],{"type":15,"value":1002},"isotopic labeling",{"type":15,"value":1004},", and the needed labeling strategy depends on protein size.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":1006,"children":1007},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":1009,"children":1011},{"id":1010},"a-big-conceptual-advantage-solution-relevance-and-conformational-selection",[1012],{"type":15,"value":1013},"A big conceptual advantage: solution relevance and conformational selection 🌊🧬",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1015,"children":1016},{},[1017],{"type":15,"value":1018},"A distinct advantage of NMR emphasized here:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1020,"children":1021},{},[1022],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1023,"children":1024},{},[1025,1027,1032],{"type":15,"value":1026},"X-ray structures can capture a conformation that is ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1028,"children":1029},{},[1030],{"type":15,"value":1031},"not the dominant one in solution",{"type":15,"value":1033},", which is often closer to physiological conditions for soluble proteins.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1035,"children":1036},{},[1037],{"type":15,"value":1038},"Example given:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1040,"children":1041},{},[1042],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1043,"children":1044},{},[1045,1050,1052,1057,1059,1064,1066,1071],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1046,"children":1047},{},[1048],{"type":15,"value":1049},"HPr",{"type":15,"value":1051}," (histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein) from ",{"type":9,"tag":18,"props":1053,"children":1054},{},[1055],{"type":15,"value":1056},"Enterococcus faecalis",{"type":15,"value":1058},":\nan X-ray structure showed a ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1060,"children":1061},{},[1062],{"type":15,"value":1063},"strained conformation",{"type":15,"value":1065}," of an important active-loop residue (proposed to be catalytically important), but NMR later indicated this conformation is ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1067,"children":1068},{},[1069],{"type":15,"value":1070},"at most a minority",{"type":15,"value":1072}," in solution.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1074,"children":1075},{},[1076],{"type":15,"value":1077},"Proposed explanation:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1079,"children":1080},{},[1081],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1082,"children":1083},{},[1084,1086,1091,1093,1098],{"type":15,"value":1085},"If multiple states exist in solution, ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1087,"children":1088},{},[1089],{"type":15,"value":1090},"crystallization may select one",{"type":15,"value":1092},"—the most “crystal-prone” conformation (a form of ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1094,"children":1095},{},[1096],{"type":15,"value":1097},"conformational selection",{"type":15,"value":1099}," imposed by crystallization conditions).",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1101,"children":1102},{},[1103],{"type":15,"value":1104},"Second illustrative case:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1106,"children":1107},{},[1108],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1109,"children":1110},{},[1111,1116,1118,1123],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1112,"children":1113},{},[1114],{"type":15,"value":1115},"Matrix metalloproteinase-12",{"type":15,"value":1117},": different crystalline environments “freeze” different conformations of flexible regions, while NMR in solution reveals ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1119,"children":1120},{},[1121],{"type":15,"value":1122},"conformational equilibria across timescales",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":1125,"children":1126},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":1128,"children":1130},{"id":1129},"core-limitation-of-solution-nmr-size-vs",[1131],{"type":15,"value":1132},"Core limitation of solution NMR: size 🐘 vs 🧲",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1134,"children":1135},{},[1136],{"type":15,"value":1137},"The chapter reiterates a key limitation:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1139,"children":1140},{},[1141],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1142,"children":1143},{},[1144,1149,1151,1156],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1145,"children":1146},{},[1147],{"type":15,"value":1148},"De novo solution NMR structure determination",{"type":15,"value":1150}," is largely confined to proteins ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1152,"children":1153},{},[1154],{"type":15,"value":1155},"below ~25 kDa",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1158,"children":1159},{},[1160],{"type":15,"value":1161},"Why (physical + practical):",{"type":9,"tag":156,"props":1163,"children":1164},{},[1165,1182],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1166,"children":1167},{},[1168,1173,1175,1180],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1169,"children":1170},{},[1171],{"type":15,"value":1172},"Slower tumbling",{"type":15,"value":1174}," for larger proteins increases ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1176,"children":1177},{},[1178],{"type":15,"value":1179},"linewidths",{"type":15,"value":1181},", potentially making signals too broad to detect.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1183,"children":1184},{},[1185,1187,1192],{"type":15,"value":1186},"More residues create more peaks → ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1188,"children":1189},{},[1190],{"type":15,"value":1191},"spectral overlap",{"type":15,"value":1193}," increases → assignments become difficult.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1195,"children":1196},{},[1197],{"type":15,"value":1198},"This is described as an active frontier: pushing the size limit is a major goal in NMR methodology.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1200,"children":1201},{},[1202],{"type":15,"value":1203},"Consequences for method choice:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1205,"children":1206},{},[1207,1224,1240],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1208,"children":1209},{},[1210,1215,1217,1222],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1211,"children":1212},{},[1213],{"type":15,"value":1214},"X-ray",{"type":15,"value":1216}," is typically the technique of choice for ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1218,"children":1219},{},[1220],{"type":15,"value":1221},"large proteins/complexes",{"type":15,"value":1223}," at atomic resolution.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1225,"children":1226},{},[1227,1232,1234,1239],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1228,"children":1229},{},[1230],{"type":15,"value":1231},"Even larger",{"type":15,"value":1233}," or non-crystallizable systems can be studied by ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1235,"children":1236},{},[1237],{"type":15,"value":1238},"cryo-EM",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1241,"children":1242},{},[1243],{"type":15,"value":1244},"NMR/X-ray can be combined with cryo-EM by supplying atomic structures for components to interpret the lower-resolution overall map.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":1246,"children":1247},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":26,"props":1249,"children":1251},{"id":1250},"solid-state-nmr-a-way-around-the-tumbling-size-limit",[1252],{"type":15,"value":1253},"Solid-state NMR: a way around the “tumbling” size limit 🧱🧲",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1255,"children":1256},{},[1257],{"type":15,"value":1258},"A key point near the end of 3.1.1:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1260,"children":1261},{},[1262],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1263,"children":1264},{},[1265,1267,1272,1274,1279,1281,1286],{"type":15,"value":1266},"The size limit due to slow tumbling ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1268,"children":1269},{},[1270],{"type":15,"value":1271},"does not apply",{"type":15,"value":1273}," to ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1275,"children":1276},{},[1277],{"type":15,"value":1278},"solid-state NMR",{"type":15,"value":1280},", because molecules are not freely rotating in solution—they’re effectively ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1282,"children":1283},{},[1284],{"type":15,"value":1285},"fixed in orientation",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1288,"children":1289},{},[1290],{"type":15,"value":1291},"The chapter notes major recent efforts to develop solid-state NMR methods for various sample types:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1293,"children":1294},{},[1295,1307,1317],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1296,"children":1297},{},[1298,1300,1305],{"type":15,"value":1299},"soluble proteins in ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1301,"children":1302},{},[1303],{"type":15,"value":1304},"microcrystalline",{"type":15,"value":1306}," form,",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1308,"children":1309},{},[1310,1315],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1311,"children":1312},{},[1313],{"type":15,"value":1314},"protein fibrils",{"type":15,"value":1316},",",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1318,"children":1319},{},[1320,1325],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1321,"children":1322},{},[1323],{"type":15,"value":1324},"membrane proteins",{"type":15,"value":1326}," in lipid bilayers, etc.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1328,"children":1329},{},[1330],{"type":15,"value":1331},"Important nuance:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1333,"children":1334},{},[1335],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1336,"children":1337},{},[1338,1340,1345,1347,1352],{"type":15,"value":1339},"In favorable cases, membrane proteins can still be studied by ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1341,"children":1342},{},[1343],{"type":15,"value":1344},"solution NMR",{"type":15,"value":1346}," if reconstituted in ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1348,"children":1349},{},[1350],{"type":15,"value":1351},"detergent micelles",{"type":15,"value":231},{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1354,"children":1355},{},[1356],{"type":15,"value":1357},"Why microcrystals matter:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1359,"children":1360},{},[1361],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1362,"children":1363},{},[1364,1366,1371],{"type":15,"value":1365},"Microcrystals can be easier to produce than the ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1367,"children":1368},{},[1369],{"type":15,"value":1370},"high-quality single crystals",{"type":15,"value":1372}," needed for X-ray diffraction, motivating solid-state NMR as an alternative route for larger proteins.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1374,"children":1375},{},[1376],{"type":15,"value":1377},"But also:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1379,"children":1380},{},[1381],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1382,"children":1383},{},[1384,1386,1391],{"type":15,"value":1385},"Solid-state NMR is still in heavy ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1387,"children":1388},{},[1389],{"type":15,"value":1390},"methodological development",{"type":15,"value":1392},", without fully standardized protocols yet (as described here).",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1394,"children":1395},{},[1396],{"type":15,"value":1397},"Where solid-state NMR has been especially successful:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1399,"children":1400},{},[1401,1411],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1402,"children":1403},{},[1404,1409],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1405,"children":1406},{},[1407],{"type":15,"value":1408},"Protein fibrils",{"type":15,"value":1410},": solid-state NMR can uniquely provide detailed atomic-level packing information.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1412,"children":1413},{},[1414,1419],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1415,"children":1416},{},[1417],{"type":15,"value":1418},"Membrane proteins",{"type":15,"value":1420},": a long-standing target for solid-state NMR (decades), and often difficult to crystallize.",{"type":9,"tag":33,"props":1422,"children":1423},{},[1424],{"type":15,"value":1425},"Historical and modern examples mentioned:",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1427,"children":1428},{},[1429,1448,1460],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1430,"children":1431},{},[1432,1434,1439,1441,1446],{"type":15,"value":1433},"Early successes: ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1435,"children":1436},{},[1437],{"type":15,"value":1438},"bacteriorhodopsin",{"type":15,"value":1440}," and ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1442,"children":1443},{},[1444],{"type":15,"value":1445},"gramicidin",{"type":15,"value":1447}," as cases where solid-state NMR enabled structural study when other methods struggled.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1449,"children":1450},{},[1451,1453,1458],{"type":15,"value":1452},"Functional conformational cycling: ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1454,"children":1455},{},[1456],{"type":15,"value":1457},"retinal proteins",{"type":15,"value":1459}," (e.g., rhodopsin) undergoing light-activated state changes in both protein and chromophore.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1461,"children":1462},{},[1463,1468],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1464,"children":1465},{},[1466],{"type":15,"value":1467},"M2 proton channel",{"type":15,"value":1469},": studied for structure, function, and ligand binding; solid-state NMR has uniquely enabled investigation of ligand binding (drugs/toxins) to functional membrane proteins.",{"type":9,"tag":68,"props":1471,"children":1472},{},[],{"type":9,"tag":10,"props":1474,"children":1476},{"id":1475},"tiny-stick-it-in-memory-recap",[1477],{"type":15,"value":1478},"Tiny “stick it in memory” recap 🧠✨",{"type":9,"tag":78,"props":1480,"children":1481},{},[1482,1506,1523,1547],{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1483,"children":1484},{},[1485,1490,1492,1497,1499,1504],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1486,"children":1487},{},[1488],{"type":15,"value":1489},"NMR shines",{"type":15,"value":1491}," because it links ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1493,"children":1494},{},[1495],{"type":15,"value":1496},"structure + dynamics",{"type":15,"value":1498}," in ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1500,"children":1501},{},[1502],{"type":15,"value":1503},"solution",{"type":15,"value":1505}," (often more physiological).",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1507,"children":1508},{},[1509,1514,1516,1521],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1510,"children":1511},{},[1512],{"type":15,"value":1513},"NMR vs X-ray",{"type":15,"value":1515}," is often about ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1517,"children":1518},{},[1519],{"type":15,"value":1520},"complementarity",{"type":15,"value":1522},", not superiority.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1524,"children":1525},{},[1526,1531,1533,1538,1540,1545],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1527,"children":1528},{},[1529],{"type":15,"value":1530},"HSQC spectra",{"type":15,"value":1532}," are a powerful way to judge ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1534,"children":1535},{},[1536],{"type":15,"value":1537},"folding state",{"type":15,"value":1539},", ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1541,"children":1542},{},[1543],{"type":15,"value":1544},"conformational heterogeneity",{"type":15,"value":1546},", and sometimes crystallization prospects—but correlation is imperfect.",{"type":9,"tag":82,"props":1548,"children":1549},{},[1550,1555,1557,1562,1563,1568,1570,1574],{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1551,"children":1552},{},[1553],{"type":15,"value":1554},"Solution NMR size limit (~25 kDa)",{"type":15,"value":1556}," comes from ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1558,"children":1559},{},[1560],{"type":15,"value":1561},"tumbling/linewidth",{"type":15,"value":1440},{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1564,"children":1565},{},[1566],{"type":15,"value":1567},"overlap/assignment",{"type":15,"value":1569}," issues; ",{"type":9,"tag":39,"props":1571,"children":1572},{},[1573],{"type":15,"value":1278},{"type":15,"value":1575}," can bypass tumbling limits and is key for fibrils/membranes.",1775084301922]