The slide shows a folded green protein structure transitioning into an unfolded chain.
It is easier to study unfolding than folding.
Why?
Two main approaches:
We measure unfolding and infer folding by thermodynamics (reversibility).
Lecture I:
Lecture II:
This lecture focuses heavily on:
Reaction:
U leftrightarrow N
Rates:
Equilibrium constant: K = rac{U}{N} = rac{k_u}{k_f}
Thermodynamics: Delta G = -RT ln K
Key concept:
Delta G° = Delta H° - TDelta S°
Plot: ln K ext{ vs } 1/T
Slope = −ΔH°/R Intercept = ΔS°/R
The graph on the slide shows a straight line — meaning enthalpy and entropy can be extracted from temperature dependence.
The schematic shows:
Principle: If unfolding absorbs heat, more power must be supplied to keep both cells at same temperature.
Modern DSC:
Page 6 shows the real instrument.
Graph shows:
Important:
✔️ Area under the peak = ΔHcal (Model independent)
Why is Cp higher without protein? Because buffer contributes baseline heat capacity.
The unfolding peak represents:
Tm = 50% folded.
Important ratio:
rac{Delta H_}{Delta H_}
Interpretation:
1 → Aggregation
This ratio checks cooperativity.
Graph shows:
T_m = rac{Delta H}{Delta S}
ΔCp introduces curvature in ΔG vs T.
Key insight: If we know:
We can calculate ΔG at any T.
Graph features:
ΔCp(unfolding) is difference between baselines.
Area under transition region = ΔHd.
Peak width reflects cooperativity.
Two cases:
Stabilizes N → Tm increases.
Graph (FGF example): Control Tm = 35.2°C With phosphate = 40.9°C With sulfate = 46.2°C
Clear rightward shift.
Stabilizes U → Tm decreases.
Lysozyme at low pH: Protons bind U → destabilization.
Page 20 shows Tm vs pH:
Methods:
Graph on p.21 shows:
If transitions overlap → likely two-state.
Denaturants:
Osmolytes:
Key equation (p.25):
Delta G_ = Delta G_ + mD
m-value reflects:
Good correlation: m-value ↔ ΔCp
Meaning: Both reflect change in solvent-accessible surface area.
Same ΔG but different m: Different exposure patterns.
Urea can:
Rate law:
rac{dU}{dt} = -k_fU + k_uN
Stop-flow allows:
Exponential behavior:
A(t) = A_0 e^{-kt}
A chevron plot =
Plot: ln k_ ext{ vs } denaturant
Two linear arms:
Left arm: ln k_f = ln k_f^{water} + m_f D
Right arm: ln k_u = ln k_u^{water} + m_u D
Shape looks like a "V" → chevron.
From p.39: kf(water) ≈ 320 s⁻¹ ku(water) ≈ 0.0005 s⁻¹
Thus: K ≈ 640,000
Very stable protein.
If plot is curved:
Transition state cannot be directly observed.
We use mutagenesis.
Φ-value:
Phi = rac{DeltaDelta G^{‡}}{DeltaDelta G}
Interpretation:
Φ ≈ 0: Residue not structured in transition state.
Φ ≈ 1: Residue fully structured in transition state.
Page 45 example: Mutant increases ku but not kf → Φ ≈ 0
Residue not native-like in transition state.
MD simulation shows: Many microscopic conformations.
Macroscopic two-state ≠ atomic two-state.
Unfolded state:
Early folding:
Transition state:
Energy landscape:
Wide top → many conformations Narrow bottom → native state
Many pathways → same native state.
Characteristics:
CD evidence (p.56):
Far UV CD: Secondary structure present.
Near UV CD: No tertiary structure.
Thus: Molten globule retains helices but loses packing.
References: Dobson 2003 Nature review on misfolding and fibrils.
Protein folding involves:
Thermodynamics:
Kinetics:
Transition state:
Energy landscape:
Intermediates: