PPT 4

Protein chemistry

1️⃣ How can we study protein folding? (p.1)

The slide shows a folded green protein structure transitioning into an unfolded chain.

Key idea:

It is easier to study unfolding than folding.

Why?

  • Folding starts from many possible conformations.
  • Unfolding starts from one well-defined native structure.

Two main approaches:

  • 🔥 Thermal unfolding
  • 🧪 Chemical unfolding

We measure unfolding and infer folding by thermodynamics (reversibility).


2️⃣ Overview of the course (p.2)

Lecture I:

  • Covalent bonds
  • Noncovalent interactions
  • Electrostatics
  • Hydrophobic effect
  • Folding basics

Lecture II:

  • Energetics
  • Calorimetry
  • Kinetics
  • Folding pathways
  • Two-state vs multi-state
  • Structured vs unstructured proteins

This lecture focuses heavily on:

  • Thermodynamics
  • Calorimetry
  • Denaturants
  • Folding kinetics
  • Transition state analysis

3️⃣ Folding equilibrium and kinetics (p.3)

Reaction:

U leftrightarrow N

Rates:

  • kf = folding rate
  • ku = unfolding rate

Equilibrium constant: K = rac{U}{N} = rac{k_u}{k_f}

Thermodynamics: Delta G = -RT ln K

Key concept:

  • If ΔG < 0 → folded favored
  • If ΔG = 0 → 50% folded (Tm)

4️⃣ Determining ΔH°, ΔS°, ΔG° (p.4)

Delta G° = Delta H° - TDelta S°

Van’t Hoff plot:

Plot: ln K ext{ vs } 1/T

Slope = −ΔH°/R Intercept = ΔS°/R

The graph on the slide shows a straight line — meaning enthalpy and entropy can be extracted from temperature dependence.


5–6️⃣ Calorimeter (DSC) (p.5–6)

The schematic shows:

  • Sample cell
  • Reference cell
  • Heat compensation system

Principle: If unfolding absorbs heat, more power must be supplied to keep both cells at same temperature.

Modern DSC:

  • ~0.5 mL sample
  • ~0.2–1 mg/mL protein

Page 6 shows the real instrument.


7️⃣ Calorimetric raw data (p.7)

Graph shows:

  • Cp vs temperature
  • Sharp peak at Tm

Important:

✔️ Area under the peak = ΔHcal (Model independent)

Why is Cp higher without protein? Because buffer contributes baseline heat capacity.

The unfolding peak represents:

  • Cooperative transition
  • Energy absorbed to break stabilizing interactions

8️⃣ Van’t Hoff enthalpy (p.8)

Tm = 50% folded.

Important ratio:

rac{Delta H_}{Delta H_}

Interpretation:

  • = 1 → Two-state folding
  • < 1 → Intermediate(s)
  • 1 → Aggregation

This ratio checks cooperativity.


9–12️⃣ Temperature dependence (p.9–12)

Graph shows:

  • ΔH increases with T
  • TΔS increases with T
  • ΔG crosses zero at Tm

T_m = rac{Delta H}{Delta S}

ΔCp introduces curvature in ΔG vs T.

Key insight: If we know:

  • ΔH(Tm)
  • ΔCp

We can calculate ΔG at any T.


13–14️⃣ Scanning calorimetry (p.13–14)

Graph features:

  • Native baseline
  • Denatured baseline
  • Peak = transition

ΔCp(unfolding) is difference between baselines.

Area under transition region = ΔHd.

Peak width reflects cooperativity.


15–20️⃣ Ligand binding effects on Tm

Two cases:

Case 1: Ligand binds native state (p.16–17)

Stabilizes N → Tm increases.

Graph (FGF example): Control Tm = 35.2°C With phosphate = 40.9°C With sulfate = 46.2°C

Clear rightward shift.

Case 2: Ligand binds denatured state (p.18–19)

Stabilizes U → Tm decreases.

Lysozyme at low pH: Protons bind U → destabilization.

Page 20 shows Tm vs pH:

  • Low pH → low Tm
  • Neutral pH → high Tm

21–22️⃣ Methods for thermal denaturation

Methods:

  • DSC → thermodynamics
  • CD → secondary structure
  • Fluorescence → tertiary structure
  • Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF)

Graph on p.21 shows:

  • DSC peak
  • CD signal change
  • Both transition at same temperature

If transitions overlap → likely two-state.


23–26️⃣ Denaturants vs osmolytes

Denaturants:

  • Urea
  • GdmHCl Stabilize unfolded state.

Osmolytes:

  • TMAO
  • Betaine
  • Trehalose Stabilize folded state.

Key equation (p.25):

Delta G_ = Delta G_ + mD

m-value reflects:

  • Exposure of surface area
  • Interaction with denaturant

27–29️⃣ m-values

Good correlation: m-value ↔ ΔCp

Meaning: Both reflect change in solvent-accessible surface area.

Same ΔG but different m: Different exposure patterns.


30️⃣ Beware of urea

Urea can:

  • Decompose
  • Carbamylate proteins
  • Change pH

32–37️⃣ Folding kinetics

Rate law:

rac{dU}{dt} = -k_fU + k_uN

Stop-flow allows:

  • Millisecond mixing
  • Monitoring fluorescence or CD

Exponential behavior:

A(t) = A_0 e^{-kt}


38–39️⃣ Chevron plots (VERY IMPORTANT)

A chevron plot =

Plot: ln k_ ext{ vs } denaturant

Two linear arms:

Left arm: ln k_f = ln k_f^{water} + m_f D

Right arm: ln k_u = ln k_u^{water} + m_u D

Shape looks like a "V" → chevron.


What does it tell us?

  1. Folding rate in water (intercept)
  2. Unfolding rate in water
  3. Equilibrium constant: K = rac{k_f}{k_u}
  4. Transition state sensitivity to denaturant

From p.39: kf(water) ≈ 320 s⁻¹ ku(water) ≈ 0.0005 s⁻¹

Thus: K ≈ 640,000

Very stable protein.


Interpretation of slopes:

  • mf reflects structure formation in transition state.
  • If slope small → transition state less native-like.

If plot is curved:

  • Folding intermediate present.

40–46️⃣ Transition state & Φ-values

Transition state cannot be directly observed.

We use mutagenesis.

Φ-value:

Phi = rac{DeltaDelta G^{‡}}{DeltaDelta G}

Interpretation:

Φ ≈ 0: Residue not structured in transition state.

Φ ≈ 1: Residue fully structured in transition state.

Page 45 example: Mutant increases ku but not kf → Φ ≈ 0

Residue not native-like in transition state.


47️⃣ Two-state folding is simplified

MD simulation shows: Many microscopic conformations.

Macroscopic two-state ≠ atomic two-state.


48–50️⃣ Folding pathway

Unfolded state:

  • Some residual structure
  • Hydrophobic clusters

Early folding:

  • Topology emerges
  • Local structures fluctuate

Transition state:

  • Native folding nucleus
  • Long-range interactions

51–52️⃣ Folding funnel

Energy landscape:

Wide top → many conformations Narrow bottom → native state

Many pathways → same native state.


53–56️⃣ Molten globule

Characteristics:

  • Compact
  • Secondary structure intact
  • No tight tertiary packing
  • Hydrophobic core exposed

CD evidence (p.56):

Far UV CD: Secondary structure present.

Near UV CD: No tertiary structure.

Thus: Molten globule retains helices but loses packing.


57️⃣ Exercises

References: Dobson 2003 Nature review on misfolding and fibrils.


🔥 Big Picture Summary

Protein folding involves:

Thermodynamics:

  • ΔG = ΔH - TΔS
  • DSC measures ΔH
  • m-values reflect exposure

Kinetics:

  • kf and ku from stop-flow
  • Chevron plots reveal mechanism

Transition state:

  • Studied by Φ-value analysis
  • Reveals folding nucleus

Energy landscape:

  • Funnel model
  • Multiple pathways

Intermediates:

  • Molten globule

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)