PPT 2

Protein chemistry

📘 Overview (Page 1)

This lecture covers four big themes:

  1. Amino acid chemical reactivity & PTMs
  2. Protein size
  3. How protein size is determined
  4. Protein sequence determination

This sets up the link between chemistry → structure → analytical methods


🧪 Chemical Reactivity of Amino Acids (Pages 2–24)

Page 2 – Nucleophiles vs Bases

  • Most protein chemistry occurs in water, ~neutral pH
  • Reactive groups = nucleophiles
  • Key distinction:
    • Basicity → affinity for H⁺
    • Nucleophilicity → attacks electrophilic atoms
  • A group can be a strong nucleophile without being a strong base (very important later for Cys, Met!)

The image lists specific side chains, enzymes they appear in, and reaction intermediates.


Pages 3–4 – Serine & Threonine

  • Side chain: –OH
  • Weak nucleophiles unless deprotonated (–O⁻)
  • Common PTMs:
    • Phosphorylation
    • O-glycosylation
    • Acetylation (rare)
  • In enzymes, Ser reacts as a serine alkoxide

Page 4 (image): Catalytic triad 🧠

  • Ser–His–Asp
  • His abstracts a proton from Ser → Ser becomes a strong nucleophile
  • Asp stabilizes His
  • This explains why Ser can be reactive despite a high pKa

Page 5 – Phosphorylation

  • Adds a di-anionic phosphate
  • Causes local conformational changes
  • Mostly Ser/Thr/Tyr in eukaryotes
  • His and Asp phosphorylation common in bacteria/fungi
  • Acts as a molecular switch

Page 6 – O-Glycosylation

  • Occurs in ER + Golgi
  • No strict consensus sequence
  • Enzyme-controlled (glycosyltransferases)
  • Structurally simpler than N-glycosylation

Pages 7–8 – Aspartate & Glutamate

  • Carboxylates (–COO⁻) → negative charge
  • Excellent metal ion ligands (Ca²⁺, Zn²⁺)
  • Used in carbodiimide coupling (peptide synthesis)

Page 8 focuses on chemical discrimination between –COO⁻ and –COOH using selective reagents.

Also:

  • Asp is the nucleophile in P-type ATPases (phosphorylated intermediate)

Page 9 – Asparagine & Glutamine

  • Amide side chains → polar but inert
  • Important PTMs:
    • N-glycosylation (Asn)
    • Gln–Lys crosslinks
    • Gln–Cys thioesters
  • Can be deaminated → Asp/Glu

Page 10 – N-Glycosylation 🧬

  • Initiated in ER membrane
  • Consensus: Asn-X-Ser/Thr
  • Highly branched & processed in Golgi
  • Important for folding, stability, trafficking

Page 11 – Protein Cross-Linking

  • Catalyzed by transglutaminases
  • Gln–Lys isopeptide bonds
  • Used industrially (e.g. plant-based meat 😄)
  • Also important biologically (clotting, ECM)

Pages 12–14 – Lysine Reactivity

  • Primary amine, positively charged
  • Strong nucleophile ONLY when deprotonated
  • Reactivity ↑ at high pH

Applications:

  • TNBS assay → counts Lys residues (λ = 367 nm)
  • Acetylation (histones)
  • Carbamylation → homocitrulline (uremia marker)

Page 15 – Alkylation of Lys & Arg

  • Methylation & acetylation regulate DNA binding
  • Histone code logic
  • Other N-acylations:
    • Biotinyl
    • Lipoyl
    • Ubiquityl (protein degradation)

Page 16 – Arginine

  • Guanidinium group
  • Charge delocalized → chemically inert
  • Methylation common (regulation)

Page 17 – Histidine ⭐

  • Imidazole ring
  • pKa ~6–7 → perfect for acid-base catalysis
  • Strong metal ligand
  • Central residue in many enzymes
  • Can be protonated/deprotonated under physiological conditions

Page 18 – Tyrosine

  • Phenolic side chain
  • Phosphorylation important in signaling
  • Less reactive than Ser/Thr but higher regulatory impact

Page 19 – Tryptophan

  • Indole ring
  • Sensitive to oxidation
  • Limited reactivity
  • Strong fluorescence relevance (later courses)

Page 20 – Methionine

  • Thioether sulfur
  • Cannot be protonated
  • Strong nucleophile at low pH
  • Easily oxidized
  • Often removed after translation

Pages 21–23 – Cysteine 🧨

  • Most reactive side chain
  • pKa ≈ 8–8.5, but environment lowers it
  • Reactive even at physiological pH
  • Forms:
    • Disulfides
    • Sulfenic / sulfinic / sulfonic acids
  • Metal binding (Zn²⁺ fingers!)

Page 23:

  • DTNB (Ellman’s reagent) → counts free thiols
  • Yellow NTB product (λ = 412 nm)

Page 24 – Disulfide Reduction

  • TCEP reduces S–S bonds
  • Stable, odorless alternative to DTT

🔪 Proteolysis & Sequencing (Pages 25–39)

Page 25 – Proteolytic Processing

  • Zymogen activation
  • Signal peptide removal
  • Post-translational trimming

Page 26 – How to Determine Sequence

Methods:

  1. Databases
  2. DNA → translation
  3. Protein digestion + MS/MS
  4. Edman degradation

Page 27 – Enzymatic Cleavage Specificity

  • Trypsin → C-term Lys/Arg
  • Chymotrypsin → aromatics
  • V8 → acidic residues
  • Asp-N → N-term Asp
  • Thermolysin → N-term hydrophobic

Pages 28–29 – Chemical Cleavage

  • Non-enzymatic specificity
  • Page 29: Cys cyanylation → selective backbone cleavage

Pages 30–32 – Edman Degradation

  • Sequential N-terminal removal
  • pH ~9 coupling
  • TFA cleavage
  • PTH-AA identified by RP-HPLC

Limitations: blocked N-termini, large proteins


⚡ Mass Spectrometry & Fragmentation (Pages 36–39)

Pages 36–37 – Why MS/MS?

  • MALDI & ESI are soft ionization
  • No fragmentation → no sequence info
  • Peptides with same mass ≠ same sequence
  • CID, ECD, ETD introduce backbone cleavage

Page 38 – Fragmentation Nomenclature

  • Roepstorff–Fohlman / Biemann
  • CID vs ETD differences
  • Fragment ions depend on cleavage site

Page 39 – b and y ions explained clearly 🔥

This is critical.

What breaks?

  • Peptide bond
  • Charge stays either on N-terminal fragment (b-ion) or C-terminal fragment (y-ion)

b-ions:

  • Contain N-terminus
  • Sequence grows from left → right
  • b₂ = first two amino acids

y-ions:

  • Contain C-terminus
  • Sequence grows from right → left
  • y₁ = last amino acid

Why both?

  • Overlapping ladders → unambiguous sequencing
  • Differences in m/z reveal residue masses

This is how MS/MS “reads” peptides.


📏 Protein Size & Shape (Pages 40–61)

Page 40 – Protein Size Range

  • Insulin: ~5.8 kDa
  • Rubisco: ~540 kDa
  • Ribosome: ~2 MDa
  • Myosin, actin filaments shown visually

Page 41 – Rules of Thumb

  • Avg aa ≈ 110 Da
  • Avg human protein ≈ 373 aa
  • Titin = 33,423 aa (~3.7 MDa!)

Size determination methods listed.


Pages 42–44 – Ultracentrifugation & Electrophoresis

  • Svedberg & Tiselius
  • Revealed:
    • Oligomeric state
    • Shape
    • Homogeneity
  • Basis for SDS-PAGE calibration

Pages 46–47 – Shape Models

  • Random coil
  • Rod
  • Prolate / Oblate
  • Globular proteins have rough surfaces

Pages 48–51 – SDS-PAGE

  • SDS denatures proteins
  • ~1 SDS per 2 aa → uniform charge
  • Rod-like migration
  • Log(Mw) vs mobility linear
  • Staining:
    • Coomassie
    • Silver
    • Western blot

Pages 52–56 – Mass Spectrometry

  • MALDI-TOF → mostly singly charged
  • ESI → charge ladders
  • Deconvolution → exact mass
  • Charge ≈ 1 per kDa

Pages 57–60 – Size Exclusion Chromatography

  • Separation by hydrodynamic radius
  • Native proteins elute earlier
  • Denatured proteins appear larger
  • Calibration with standards

Page 61 – Method Comparison

  • SEC, MS, SDS-PAGE, ultracentrifugation compared
  • Each measures a different physical property

Page 62 – End

Summary slide / transition


🧠 Key Take-Home Messages

  • Reactivity ≠ charge ≠ pKa
  • Protein chemistry depends on microenvironment
  • PTMs regulate function
  • MS/MS + b/y ions = modern sequencing
  • Size depends on method and shape

Quiz

Score: 0/30 (0%)